HEADS UP!!!

Site upgrade in progress... Core site functions are working, but some non-critical features/functions will be temporarily unavailable while we work to restore them over the next couple of weeks.

Please post any bugs you encounter, but before you do, check to see if it's already listed.

Thanks for your patience while we work to improve the community.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
geshields

Stewart's YZ450F Rubber isolated frame mounts...

8 posts in this topic

Can't change the position with one of 4 mounts. It's not being done for engine vibration, as the top mount doesn't appear modified, and the rear mount would be pretty difficult to build an isolator into.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think they meant to say it's to give the frame more flex to affect turning and/or other handling characteristics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any flexibility in the mounting of the motor would allow it to shift backward upon acceleration and forward once the throttle was let off, like your ould V-8 flopped to the side when you gave it the gas. That couldn't be good at all. More likely the single resilient mount provides for thermal expansion or flexing of the frame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any flexibility in the mounting of the motor would allow it to shift backward upon acceleration and forward once the throttle was let off, like your ould V-8 flopped to the side when you gave it the gas. That couldn't be good at all. More likely the single resilient mount provides for thermal expansion or flexing of the frame.

It didn't bother the Norton Commando, and the later Harley's with isolator engine mounts are OK. Every car and truck on the road has rubber engine mounts. Race cars tend not to use them, but only because of the reliability concerns related to their tearing/breaking under the extreme stress.

I do think you're correct that this looks to be just the one front mount that's been done this way, probably to add the flex of the curved part of the cradle into the steering head. Something I wouldn't recommend, but....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"probably to the flex of the curved part of the cradle into the steering head"

wouldn't the main frame have to flex also in order for the lower cradle to flex? i'm having a hard time visualizing that much flex in the frame with so much suspension travel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't get me started, OK. I have a kind of negative overall view of the whole idea that there's a benefit to actually encouraging the frame to flex. Doesn't seem to be well received.

And yes, your first assumption is correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"And yes, your first assumption is correct. "

it wasn't an assumption but a question,...to you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0