HEADS UP!!!

Site upgrade in progress... Core site functions are working, but some non-critical features/functions will be temporarily unavailable while we work to restore them over the next couple of weeks.

Please post any bugs you encounter, but before you do, check to see if it's already listed.

Thanks for your patience while we work to improve the community.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
rider412

yz426 vs ktm520

6 posts in this topic

No, but I’ve ridden an ’00 520 SX.

It was noticeably lighter, easier to start, and faster (in that order). I rode it for 15 minutes in a sand wash and whooped out trail. The forks weren’t as good as my (bone stock) ’00 426, not as plush but still softer overall. Plus a 4 speed has no place in a modern DIRT bike (supercross bike maybe), I noticed and disliked the lack of 5th gear right away.

IMO the 4 speed makes this a motocross only bike. No trails, no GPs , no off-road, nada. Why’d they do that??? What does one extra lousy gear weigh (they’ve got room to spare)? Are there that many people who do nothing but 100% moto? Don’t people like this get tired of going around in circles? Just wondering…

I think the bike tops out at around 70 mph w/ stock gearing.

But I think both the MXC and EXC will easily top 100.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A racing friend of mine gave me a report on the KTM, this guy previously rode a 426 and the thing he noticed most was the weight difference. He said the KTM felt much lighter. He also said the KTM parts were both harder to find and more expensive...

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Originally posted by Hick:

No, but I’ve ridden an ’00 520 SX.

IMO the 4 speed makes this a motocross only bike. No trails, no GPs , no off-road, nada. Why’d they do that??? What does one extra lousy gear weigh (they’ve got room to spare)? Are there that many people who do nothing but 100% moto? Don’t people like this get tired of going around in circles? Just wondering…

I read that you can retrofit the EXC/MXC 5th and 6th gears into the SX gearbox. Its the same tranny, they just left out the top two gears to save weight on the SX. I suppose if you can spend 7-8 grand on an SX, whats splitting the cases to get more gears? I love my 426 now that it runs well (with a carb swap), but if I was going for a KTM I would just go for the MXC and pick up the e start and the 3.7 (3.3?) gal tank for HS and off road. The MXC adds some weight of course, but maybe since it has a kickstarter too I would take off the Estuff to save weight in the summer on the track (in the winter I do HS and I lust after that ebutton). I would replace that orange plastic with black, and buy an SX tank for the track. Maybe try to see if a YZ, CR, KX etc front fender in black would fit well to replace the phallus. The suspension and lower 4 gears are the same, Im told, so the MXC sounds good and versatile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ive ridden a 01 520 sx. it was basicly a works bike. and still the suspension on a 01 426 is better. and the grunt on a 426 is better. no offense but the 520 is smooth, and is better suited for older guys who dont want to die when then whack the throttle. for us young guys though. the 426 is it. until honda suzuki or kawasaki produces something like the 426 but lighter. we dont need to look past the yzf's. although the ktm was fun. and i would race it. but not as effectivly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0