Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Sidd

Ideal weight for stock 07'yz 250 springs.

16 posts in this topic

Anyone know off hand what the stock suspension is set up for as far as rider weight, without gear. I guess gear would add about 20 lbs. Thank you.

Sidd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note that you need to specify what type of riding you are setting up the suspension for; eg. MX, desert, GNCC, enduro, etc.

See http://www.mx-tech.com/index.php?id=spring_generator to enter the data you are interested getting results for.

Do note that the stock rates given here are for the '08 YZ250. The '06 & '07 stock spring rates are 0.42 kg/mm & 4.8 kg/mm, according to the Yamaha Parts information.

So, for enduro type riding, the stock suspension is just right for someone who weighs 195 lbs., with their gear on.

I'm going to ask Jeremy if we also need to factor in all of the extra 'bike protection' we tend to bolt up to a bike ridden in the woods, etc. I'm talking to him soon, anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My manual for my 07 YZ250 2t calls for .429 (.430) in the front and a 4.9 rear :thumbsup:

I weigh 150, maybe 160 or so with gear.. I went to .440 in the front and am investing in a 5.0 or 5.1 for the rear.. Primarily for desert and woods.. Very little moto....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I weigh 150, maybe 160 or so with gear.. I went to .440 in the front and am investing in a 5.0 or 5.1 for the rear.. Primarily for desert and woods.. Very little moto.... :thumbsup::rolleyes: :rolleyes: I weigh 169 with gear on and couldn't handle a heavier spring on the front, it's already low oil level inside fork and outter leg and it seems too stiff. The back i think is 4.8k and it is perfect, any heavier and wouldn't like it. This is only for MX tracks, if I did woods I'd probably go down on spring rate and adjust dampening. May go 5.0 in rear for desert but I'd have to see compared to 4.8. Am I missing something ???? I thought with your weight and No MX racing, you'd want to go down or at least stay stock, and play with dampening???:crazy:

Techmc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tech, me and my tuner have been experimenting with stiffer springs and uber soft valving with very good results.. The stiffer springshelp carry the bike in the top of the travel where the action is very plush, then they also seem to help control bottoming, along with adding oil to the fork.. I should also mention we've completely removed the mid valve in the fork to further exaggerate the soft feel in the front..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, thats right I had heard on here about you doing that, but I didn't know if it was working for you. I definately will look into removing mid valving from front. But I'm happy with rear right now. Maybe it can work for just MX!

Techmc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously some factories set spring rates a little different. Most mx bikes are supplied for an intermediate rider. Weight is 125-140 for a 125, 250 is near 165-175 and closer to 180 for the open bikes like the older kx 500 or cr 500. Yamaha went stiffer in the past year and it is close to being set up correctly for the listed weights with gear. Boots weigh damn near 10 lbs.

As SpDyKen said, the type of riding is going to play a big part in how stiff you want the springs. A properly sprung for Motocross bike can beat the living hell out of you on an all day ride.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yea, thats right I had heard on here about you doing that, but I didn't know if it was working for you. I definately will look into removing mid valving from front. But I'm happy with rear right now. Maybe it can work for just MX!

Techmc

Im very, VERY happy with the fork right now and we are only on our second internal change.. :rolleyes: Still have a couple ideas I want to discuss with Mitch, my tuner..

The shock is unfortunately being out performed by the fork now.. The fork action is very compliant with rolling and square edge bumps where the shock feels pretty too slow and a little harsh.. But as I soften up comp and speed up rebound to compliment the fork I have bottoming and deflection issues.. Our idea is that hopefully the stiffer spring and softer valving in rear will help carry the rear end higher and defend bottoming while remaining plush.. Time will tell.. :thumbsup:

BTW Im also running 18" rear and 20" front.. Really takes the edge off :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My manual for my 07 YZ250 2t calls for .429 (.430) in the front and a 4.9 rear :thumbsup:

I weigh 150, maybe 160 or so with gear.. I went to .440 in the front and am investing in a 5.0 or 5.1 for the rear.. Primarily for desert and woods.. Very little moto....

This is confusing me. I pulled this from Yamaha 's website - 20 1P8-23141-M1-00 SPRING, FRONT FORK (K=4.2N/ ; and, 9 1C3-22212-20-00 SPRING (K=48N/MM) , at: http://www.yamaha-motor.com/sport/parts/home.aspx

I just checked my '06 YZ250 manuals; they say that the 4.9 is the standard spring, as well. I'd sure like to know what the truth is. I'll be talking to Jeremy tomorrow; I'll be sure to ask him about this.

It makes it hard to buy take-off springs, if you cannot trust the parts listings for the different YZ's.

Anyone out there know more about this issue?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember them talking abotu the ti spring when it was released. The word was that is was sort of progressive and not rated accurately. Still, I have never had problems with mine.

The rear spring went from a 4.8 in 2005 to a 4.9 in 2006. The fork spring got slightly softer in the same time period. 2005 was a .43 to a .42.

The problem the tolerances of the spring can be off quite a bit from the rating. If MX tech or Race tech tested the oem springs they might be off quite a bit from the service manual.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My rider will be using it for outdoor motocross and weights between 150 and 155 without gear. I couldn't believe all the posts that showed up:applause:

Sidd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0