HEADS UP!!!

Site upgrade in progress... Core site functions are working, but some non-critical features/functions will be temporarily unavailable while we work to restore them over the next couple of weeks.

Please post any bugs you encounter, but before you do, check to see if it's already listed.

Thanks for your patience while we work to improve the community.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
arcboy

Which Tank

14 posts in this topic

I tried to research this but I didn't find quite what I was looking for.

My 01 WR426 has a crack at the top of the tank and I need a new one. I have figured out that I don't want a Clarke because I have to buy a YZ seat. So it is either IMS or Accerbis.

Which fits better?

What size should I get a 3.4 or 4.0 gallon. I don't do a lot of long distance riding other than on the road with the SM setup. The 4.0 would be nice but I don't want this huge tank looking like some ugly piece of plastic taking over my bike.

I priced out the 4.0 IMS for $250.00, not sure on Accerbis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any of the "YZ" tanks, Clarke, IMS , or Acerbis will require the YZ seat...which really improves the ergos. You can really slide up on the tank in turns to plant the front end. The Zip Ty tank carries the fuel lowest, followed by the Acerbis , then IMS and Clarke are about the same.

From what I can see from their web sites, the only tank that uses the stock WR seat is the IMS 4.0 gal. tank. The Acerbis refers you to a 3.4 gal YZF tank, as do the IMS and Clarke sites.

If you decide to go with the 3.4 gal tank and YZF seat (the WR and YZF shrouds are the same), the Acerbis has by far the best fit and finish. They also make the Zip Ty tank, which looks the trickest (and has the same high quality fit and finish) but blocks access to the chole and hot start buttons on the carb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any of the "YZ" tanks, Clarke, IMS , or Acerbis will require the YZ seat...which really improves the ergos. You can really slide up on the tank in turns to plant the front end. The Zip Ty tank carries the fuel lowest, followed by the Acerbis , then IMS and Clarke are about the same.

From what I can see from their web sites, the only tank that uses the stock WR seat is the IMS 4.0 gal. tank. The Acerbis refers you to a 3.4 gal YZF tank, as do the IMS and Clarke sites.

If you decide to go with the 3.4 gal tank and YZF seat (the WR and YZF shrouds are the same), the Acerbis has by far the best fit and finish. They also make the Zip Ty tank, which looks the trickest (and has the same high quality fit and finish) but blocks access to the chole and hot start buttons on the carb.

looks like the Zip Ty tank still requires a YZ seat according to their website, but doesn't look like it covers the choke and hot start buttons. I wonder if the 4.0 IMS tank looks ridiculously large on the bike.

If I can find a YZ seat for cheap than I will be getting the 4.0 IMS tank even though I won't need all 4 gallons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
looks like the Zip Ty tank still requires a YZ seat according to their website, but doesn't look like it covers the choke and hot start buttons. I wonder if the 4.0 IMS tank looks ridiculously large on the bike.

If I can find a YZ seat for cheap than I will be getting the 4.0 IMS tank even though I won't need all 4 gallons.

Yup, Zip Ty does require the YZ seat. While the pic looks like you can get to the choke and hot start, I have read many reviews that say you can't...when Ty Davis was asked about it, he said "I don't need the choke when I race, and I have a remote hot start, so what's the big deal. I'd rather have the gas lower!"

For what it's worth, I picked up YZ seats in real good condition for both my son's 250 and my 426 on e-bay for about 25 bucks each.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I tried to research this but I didn't find quite what I was looking for.

My 01 WR426 has a crack at the top of the tank and I need a new one. I have figured out that I don't want a Clarke because I have to buy a YZ seat. So it is either IMS or Accerbis.

Which fits better?

What size should I get a 3.4 or 4.0 gallon. I don't do a lot of long distance riding other than on the road with the SM setup. The 4.0 would be nice but I don't want this huge tank looking like some ugly piece of plastic taking over my bike.

I priced out the 4.0 IMS for $250.00, not sure on Accerbis.

I have a Zip Ty Racing 3.1 gal (made by IMS) tank on my YZ and you need a remote Hot Start. I can access the choke but it is hidden. You will notice how much narrower the bike is the the Zip Ty Racing tank is compared to your WR tank as the Zip Ty Tank is the same width as a stock YZ tank. You may also have to install YZ radiator shrouds.

Also, I ran into a problem trying to buy a exhaust as the tank would only work the the stock header bend.:prof:

01YZ426.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a Zip Ty Racing 3.1 gal (made by IMS ) tank on my YZ and you need a remote Hot Start. I can access the choke but it is hidden. You will notice how much narrower the bike is the the Zip Ty Racing tank is compared to your WR tank as the Zip Ty Tank is the same width as a stock YZ tank. You may also have to install YZ radiator shrouds.

Also, I ran into a problem trying to buy a exhaust as the tank would only work the the stock header bend.:prof:

01YZ426.jpg

Yeah that would be nice to have a low sitting tank but I think it just looks too big and I don't want to have to relocate the hot start. I guess the Acerbis 3.4 with the YZ seat is the one for me.

Thanks everyone for the help!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well actually I just checked out my manual and it says:

12 L (2.64 Imp gal, 3.17 US gal)

(For USA, CDN)

8.0 L (1.76 Imp gal, 2.11 US gal)

(Except for USA, CDN)

Reserve 1.6 L (0.35 Imp gal, 0.42 US gal)

(For USA, CDN)

1.4 L (0.31 Imp gal, 0.37 US gal)

(Except for USA, CDN)2

So I guess I will just get the stock replacement because I don't think that an extra .23 gallons is such a big deal and I think it should look better.

Unless I am reading it wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When my stock WR tank cracked (as they all seem to, eventually), I found it was cheaper by about 150 bucks to get the IMS YZ tank and a YZ seat that to order a stock tank from Yamaha. The YZ tank/seat combo is a whole lot thinner than the WR tank, and at least in my opinion, looks a whole lot better, too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When my stock WR tank cracked (as they all seem to, eventually), I found it was cheaper by about 150 bucks to get the IMS YZ tank and a YZ seat that to order a stock tank from Yamaha. The YZ tank/seat combo is a whole lot thinner than the WR tank, and at least in my opinion, looks a whole lot better, too.

Yeah but you lose a a bunch of fuel capacity, that is one advantage of getting a WR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah but you lose a a bunch of fuel capacity, that is one advantage of getting a WR.

To clarify...I went with the IMS 3.4 gal "YZF" tank and YZ seat...that way I didn't lose the capacity. I still think it looks better than the stock WR...the R/H side of the stock WR tank just looks funny to me. If I had it to do over again, I would go with the Acerbis 3.4 gal tank. Fit and finish are better, and it carries the fuel a bit lower

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would recommend the Acerbis. It's well worth the change in handling. It really makes the bike better. If you still want the stocker. I have it sitting in the garage. Send me a message and I'll sell it to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0