HEADS UP!!!

Site upgrade in progress... Core site functions are working, but some non-critical features/functions will be temporarily unavailable while we work to restore them over the next couple of weeks.

Please post any bugs you encounter, but before you do, check to see if it's already listed.

Thanks for your patience while we work to improve the community.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
loudarbs

Bigger rear or smaller front.

5 posts in this topic

I know that they say you lose more mechanical advantage if you go with a smaller sprocket. Keeping the gearing ratio that I want the same, should I go with a smaller front sprocket or a bigger rear sprocket? Also assuming that the rear axle position will stay the same. What's everyones thoughts? Does extra chain wt make a difference?. Does added friction in the chain guides make a difference? Just a couple primer questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the same gear ratio, for example, 13/49 vs. 14/52, there is no difference in the two setups from the standpoint of the "leverage" the engine has over the rear wheel at all.

The smaller front sprocket will produce a very small increase in frictional losses within the chain due to the increased rotational angle of the links passing over it, but it's such a small difference that it's negligible from a practical standpoint. I seriously doubt it could be reliably detected on a dyno. A bigger issue is that the sprocket and chain will wear faster over sprockets having 12 or fewer teeth.

In the rear, larger sprockets are necessarily heavier, but here again, what really is the weight difference in two otherwise identical sprockets, one a 49 and the other a 52? Drag at the lower guide can become a factor if the sprocket is so large that the chain must deflect over the back edge of the guide in order to run down to the sprocket. This, however, is more of a problem because of the wear it causes the guide than for the power loss involved.

Chain weight is also not significant between the two setups, since at most, it would require a difference of not more than one link; two pins one way or other out of 114 is less than one percent.

So, IMO, it's functionally immaterial which way one does it, as long as both sprockets are within practical limits as to their size.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great response Gray except you forgot one important factor, $$ Price $$. Just kidding. Thanks. Great info. Do you think going with the larger rear sprocket and added chain length will affect rotational mass enough that it could be noticed by seat-of-the-pants?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Machinery designed to measure such things would find it virtually undetectable. Whether you feel it or not (and realistically, you won't be able to) depends on what you convince yourself of. That's why the black feather worked for Dumbo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0