HEADS UP!!!

Site upgrade in progress... Core site functions are working, but some non-critical features/functions will be temporarily unavailable while we work to restore them over the next couple of weeks.

Please post any bugs you encounter, but before you do, check to see if it's already listed.

Thanks for your patience while we work to improve the community.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Krannie McKranface

test rode a WR400 today: why no bottom end?

12 posts in this topic

I am looking for a plated ............ (fill in the blank) for local rides, and today I tried out a '99 WR400. It had been uncorked, fmf bomb/Q2, and a fresh valve train.

I was suprised to find that while it runs very clean down low, It had a hard time pulling in the low and mid range: it really needed to rev out to pull each gear. And it was geared very low (55mph tops).

I suspect a worn piston/rings, as it had no decelleration resistance when the throttle was backed off (unlike my Honda CRF).

Is this basically the nature of the 400: a bit revy, and about 36 hp? That's what it felt like (compared to my uncorked DRZ 400).

I'm asking because I like the way the WR's handle the really tight trails, and there are several plated ones around here to look at.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I rode a choked up YZ 400f (pro circuit T-4 with restrictive baffle) this saturday and it had decent low end. Me thinks that bike you test rode may have had a problem

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, my 99 wr400 is super strong on the bottom. It also has a TON of compression braking. I have no problem running with the newer 450's. I'd say it's probably due for a top-end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine pulls strong right through the revs, definitely something wrong.

Were oyu able to kick it without using the decomp. lever to get you past TDC for the kick - I'd expect that to be a sign of lower than normal compression.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with every one else, my 99 was a rude and nasty beast compared to any of my other WR's :crazy: It hit hard, like YZ hard :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell him to lower the price by $500, then spend like $220 on a piston, rings, base and head gaskets, and a timing chain :D

I'm sure you can do it yourself! :crazy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It must have been that bike, maybe a top end is needed?

My dad's WR426 is an animal. It is a little heavy but it definatly is no slouch. It flat gets up and goes!

Ride a different WR400 and feel the difference!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Might me a dumb question but what size sprockets? :crazy: If it has a 15 front and 48 rear the low end might be lagging

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Krannie-

Definately something wrong with that bike...like you suspect, probably top end. Was it hard to start? Could you kick it through wihtout the decomp lever? If the valve train had been gone through, it's possible that the intake cam is timed wrong, as well. Will the owner let you run a compression check? My 444 puts out about 185 psi. I would expect a 400 in good shape will be somewhere between 165 and 180 psi as well. If the compresion is good, offer the guy a bit less, and work the issue. Maybe cam timing, maybe ignition. As you know, the plate is worth a bunch and you will love the bike once you get the low end worked out. I'm in Palmton and have a 426...available for parts swapping shotgun troubleshooting if you pick the sucker up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently bought a '99 400F and can attest to the power they make. Scary sometimes because I'm a novice rider. My co-riders are on 426's, 450's and 250 2-strokes, I have the oldest bike in the bunch but hang with them easily.

The WR/YZ400 is the benchmark for all bikes since it's introduction. If your bike performs the way you say it does, something is wrong for sure. The only problem with the 400 IMHO is it's weight, the newer bikes are lighter especially the KTM's but I can't afford them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0