HEADS UP!!!

Site upgrade in progress... Core site functions are working, but some non-critical features/functions will be temporarily unavailable while we work to restore them over the next couple of weeks.

Please post any bugs you encounter, but before you do, check to see if it's already listed.

Thanks for your patience while we work to improve the community.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
William

Trail Rider review 2000 WR400F

5 posts in this topic

Well they gave it a good review, a few small things they would change, but overall they really liked it and they tested it in Costa Rica which has terrain just like hawaii, tight, rocky, roots, mud and so on and that is were i live, as a matter of fact i go dirt riding right out my driveway over 500 miles of trails and i don't even have to load up, life is good. As a matter of fact i went riding after work for two hours to test motogreg set up and it works, yea.

But anyway at the end of the write up it said , the only thing the WR and that was it, i looked all over the mag. for more none to be found, so i called trail rider and said what happened, he told me it was left out by the printer, then over the phone he read me the rest of and it said, WR was lacking was a ele. start not real important because one it starts easy and two ele. starts are not the most important thing on a four banger yet, but if it becomes one yamaha will have to follow the times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They also left out that it was to loud and that yamaha should follow suit of the other manufacturers on making a pipe that gives full performance without the noise. I agree, as loud bikes are a problem and cause problems on public lands.

------------------

99 WR400

BRC

NOHVA

AMA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The comments from people in the Dirt Rider review sounded like some people chose the KTM over the WR just because of the electric start. Some of the riders had actually chosen the WR as the best bike.

I agree on the exhaust. KTM has done a good job in this department. But then again, their pipes have a huge can!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got the new Dirt Bike today and they have a test of the 400exc and the wr400. The wr is much faster they say, the stock wr tank being the only thing they didn't like. They say the wr (with stock wr cam timing) is still the fastest 400.

------------------

'99 WR400

'92 GSXR 7/11

Visit my photo album AT YOUR OWN RISK!! My photo album

Anyone here a sportbike fan also? Then visit us here at www.insanespeed.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Dirt Rider one of the riders commented that he was sure he was faster on the WR than any of the bikes, but that he had to be because of the suspension/engine. He also said that the bike would wear you out in a long race (3hrs).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0