HEADS UP!!!

Site upgrade in progress... Core site functions are working, but some non-critical features/functions will be temporarily unavailable while we work to restore them over the next couple of weeks.

Please post any bugs you encounter, but before you do, check to see if it's already listed.

Thanks for your patience while we work to improve the community.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ballistic

main jet inconsistancies!!! beware !!

8 posts in this topic

OK OK... I trumped it up a little, but I am sitting here comparing two #165MJ's... one has the little Keihin star logo, the other is of unknown manufacture with no logo. The no-namer is 1-2 mm deeper at the aperature end(not the threaded end). I compared my other keihin jets to no-name and they all have the same 1-2 mm diff.

Does it matter? Are origional Keihin jets superior? Is this not a major variation for something as precise as carb jets??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I recall from my MC mechanic days they are flow rated.Number is based on the actual flow capability and not the hole size/profile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm talking about the first opening. The opening first has a larger hole (big enuff for the tip of the needle to go into), then it steps down to 1.65mm. The step occurs about 1-2 mm deeper on no-name than on Keihin jets. Has anyone ever noticed this before, and should it matter? I wondering if the clip position would need to be changed to compensate.

[This message has been edited by ballistic (edited 08-01-2001).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad that you posted this question Balistic. I ordered a 180MJ from the dealer and it was shorter than the stock 165. I chose to not even try it till I got more info.

MA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I called sudco and asked one of thier technicians. He said Keihin flow tests every single jet they produce, and he he does not have the same confidence in aftermarket jets. His advice was to stay away from anything other than the origional.

I closely compared my two jets further and notice that Keihin has a finely radiused edge, the no name just has a sharp edge. Hhmmmm....

For the sake of argument I am going to delay rejetting today, till I get the Keihin jet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballistic, I'm no engineer but perhaps the shorter jet with a smaller hole does provide the same flow rate as the longer stock jet. Is this simple mathmatics?

MA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have also noticed the difference on replacement jets. I don't trust the jets without the Keihin star and never use any others. With something so precise as this, small changes could make a difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0