HEADS UP!!!

Site upgrade in progress... Core site functions are working, but some non-critical features/functions will be temporarily unavailable while we work to restore them over the next couple of weeks.

Please post any bugs you encounter, but before you do, check to see if it's already listed.

Thanks for your patience while we work to improve the community.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
YZ400FPower

What is diff from the YZ400F to the YZ426F

5 posts in this topic

I mean I know the motor size but what else? I am constantly hearing that alot of parts on these bikes are interchangeable.

I would just like know the major changes between the bikes.

Thanks

keith :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, there are alot of small differences to the components that make them different but still the same!

The shrouds are different because of the way they mount to the radiators, which are different.

Tank and seat same, rear fender too?

Front number plate mounts differently.

Forks are basically the same. Shock is different (426 has hi speed compression damping).

Wheels are the same.

Crank is different, cylinder of course.

That's about as much as my foggy memory can bear!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am assuming the clutch is completely different as well. Rekluse doesn't make a Z-Start for the 400 and says the 426 version will not work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am assuming the clutch is completely different as well. Rekluse doesn't make a Z-Start for the 400 and says the 426 version will not work.

Prolly won't fit inside the cover. The 400 clutch has one fewer plate, and while I'd be surprised if a 426/400 case isn't interchangeable, perhaps the right side cover is deeper on the 426 to allow the extra clutch plate.

I would be similarly surprised if there wasn't some (relatively) easy way to make a Z-Start for a 426 fit the 400 (perhaps by using a 426 right cover).

First and second gear are also taller on the 426 vs. the 400.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was giving thought at one time to trade my '99 400 for a newer '01 or '02 426. But the bikes are basically the same from '98 to '02. Sure the 426 has better carb and 26 more cc, but I put a 420 kit in mine. Kept same sized rod, stock clutch, ect. No problems. Think fork rake / offset is different too, improved water pump bearing on '99 from '98. Small changes that can be upgraded in most cases. I put an '00 front fender and number plate on mine, White bros. e-series with header, etc. The 400 / 426 were ahead of their time and make great bikes for those who don't make a living on them. I plan on keeping mine for some time yet and may do a Hurricane yellow plastics on it next year to make it feel like a new bike. If you maintain it well ( filter every ride, oil at 4 hours ) it will last as long as you want it. Yes they are 20 pounds too heavy, up side : forces me to train and lift! Also they are cheap to come by. Look up one of Hick's replies here from a few days ago on same subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0