HEADS UP!!!

Site upgrade in progress... Core site functions are working, but some non-critical features/functions will be temporarily unavailable while we work to restore them over the next couple of weeks.

Please post any bugs you encounter, but before you do, check to see if it's already listed.

Thanks for your patience while we work to improve the community.

Cntrmass

2015 vs 2016 WR 450

27 posts in this topic

Not having much luck finding the specs differences between the 2 years.

Any info would be greatly appreciated.

Looking at a new 2015 with the upgrade to the throttle etc for 7600.

Or a 2016 new 8600.

Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Completely diff bikes

2015 bike is the trusty 5 valve motor with fuel injection

2016 bike is the reverse cylinder 4 valve motor like the current mx bike

2015 puts out less power than the earlier carb version and is hard to start without fi tweaks

2016 bike is a monster, starts easily and handles better but is a bit of a handful sue to power unless you a good rider who can get the best from it

Edited by GuyGraham
5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Completely diff bikes

2015 bike is the trusty 5 valve motor with fuel injection

2016 bike is the reverse cylinder 4 valve motor like the current mx bike

2015 puts out less power than the earlier carb version and is hard to start without fi tweaks

2016 bike is a monster, starts easily and handles better but is a bit of a handful sue to power unless you a good rider who can get the best from it

I cannot comment on 2015 v 2016 as I've not ridden a 2016 yet.

I can however catagorically state the 2012 is faster than the 2009. I've owned and modified both so am speaking from experience...not speculation.

Cheers

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For an out the door price of $2k less than the MSRP of a '16, MXJunky opted for the left over '15 and isn't going to be losing any sleep over it.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot comment on 2015 v 2016 as I've not ridden a 2016 yet.

I can however catagorically state the 2012 is faster than the 2009. I've owned and modified both so am speaking from experience...not speculation.

Cheers

 

 

I didn't say faster/slower

Less is more sometimes

I'm faster on my WR250 than my old WR450

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You would be mad not to go the 2016 for $1000 more, day and night a better bike in every way

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a 2015 holdover and would highly recommend stepping up to the 16. Much better bike

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a 2015 holdover and would highly recommend stepping up to the 16. Much better bike

For what reasons would you recommend the 2016 over the 2015? I keep going back and forth between buying 2015 or waiting until I can get a good deal on a 2016. If I go with the 2016, then there is the internal debate between the WR or the FX. I would love to be able to test ride them all back to back. Since I don't see that happening I have to listen to the advise of owners such as yourself. Thus the question about the reasons for your recommendation... Or anybody else's for that matter. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For what reasons would you recommend the 2016 over the 2015? I keep going back and forth between buying 2015 or waiting until I can get a good deal on a 2016. If I go with the 2016, then there is the internal debate between the WR or the FX. I would love to be able to test ride them all back to back. Since I don't see that happening I have to listen to the advise of owners such as yourself. Thus the question about the reasons for your recommendation... Or anybody else's for that matter. 

 

The '16 is waaaaaay more refined in all respects, especially the FI, the ECU, and the build quality.

 

The '16 feels 30lbs lighter all the time, unless you get stuck under the bike on the side of a hill. Then the 6 less lbs are invisible...

 

The WR is for plating.

If you want to plate your bike, and your state makes it tough to do with a 'closed course' bike, get the WR. 

 

If you just want lighting, you can add that to the FX.

 

The FX is noticably more aggressive in power, steering, and suspension, compared to a stock uncorked WR.

 

The FX is not as aggressive as a YZF, and no where near as agressive as the older carb'd YZF's in terms of power delivery.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For an out the door price of $2k less than the MSRP of a '16, MXJunky opted for the left over '15 and isn't going to be losing any sleep over it.

+1. I just picked up a leftover '13, new, 0 miles, for $4800 out the door.

For a 47 yr old dude that is just a weekend trail warrior, I couldn't be happier.  I'll work on making the needed adjustments over the winter.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

+1. I just picked up a leftover '13, new, 0 miles, for $4800 out the door.

For a 47 yr old dude that is just a weekend trail warrior, I couldn't be happier.  I'll work on making the needed adjustments over the winter.

 

If you know of any more at this price please pm me.

 

I know there are TONS of 250's left, as some of my big  vendors are giving them away as raffle door prizes for christmas......they are that cheap...

Edited by Krannie McKranface

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

+1. I just picked up a leftover '13, new, 0 miles, for $4800 out the door.

 

Holy Crap! For that price I would buy one of those, even if it was just to resell it. People are trying to sell used 12s for $3200 to $6000.

 

The '16 is waaaaaay more refined in all respects, especially the FI, the ECU, and the build quality.

 

The '16 feels 30lbs lighter all the time,.....

 

 

 

The FX is noticably more aggressive in power, steering, and suspension, compared to a stock uncorked WR.

 

The FX is not as aggressive as a YZF, and no where near as agressive as the older carb'd YZF's in terms of power delivery.

Thanks Krannie, that is the kind of information I am looking for. I think I will live with my 06 until I can get the FX. I really don't want to buy a bike and a month later have the "buyers remorse", thinking "Damn! I should have just been patient.". I just hate being patient.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right on fellas. It was an ebay listing in moline illinois. They were asking 6200 with a best offer option. Offered 4800 and they accepted it.

They could have more deals, check them out.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Selling my 2016 for $7300. I've ridden it a total of 3 weekend camping/riding trips. Bought new in August.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

came across this in France...

 

9d053ff7e724e057071380665ef0e483b76cf8ce

 

asking 18K in euros..

 

next email.. 14K

last email 11K..

only has 50 kms on the odo...

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The dealer was going to install a upgrade kit.

It's on national back order.

Can you elaborate on this kit?

I just bought a brand new 450 because it saved me $3k vs a 2016

I have to agree that starting the bike suuuuuucks. It takes 10+ tries sometimes on the e start and it's ticking me off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MXJunky hasn't had any problems starting his '15 model.  Three presses of the button, max.  Using the kickstarter fires it right up, very easily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now