Power difference from 400 to 426


5 replies to this topic
  • Tevonini

Posted July 08, 2012 - 07:55 PM

#1

Hey guys I am currently saving for a wr 426, but being the Craigslist junkie I am, I have found quite a few wr 400's for about 400-600$ less I'm just wondering if how much more power/speed/ tourqe the 426 has than the 400 facts would be nice but opinions are also appreciated

And are the 400's as hard to start as the 426's?

Thanks in advance

  • Pooley

Posted July 09, 2012 - 07:19 AM

#2

I don't have any experience regarding the power differences, but don't fall victim to the "hard starting" BS. Once properly jetted, and you know "the procedure", starting is a non-issue.

  • Rot Box

Posted July 09, 2012 - 10:46 AM

#3

I agree with Pooley my 426 is the best/easiest starting bike I've owned. They just have to be tuned right and started correctly.

As for power I have a hard time believing there is a major difference in power between the 400 and 426--or the 450 for that matter but I could be wrong. If i remember right the 426's received a bigger clutch, Ti-valves, updated carb, higher output lighting coil and larger rod bearing as well as a few other things. Not sure it thats a deal breaker or not... Sorry I can't be more help.

Andrew

Edited by Rot Box, July 09, 2012 - 10:47 AM.


Visit the ThumperTalk Store for the lowest prices on motorcycle / ATV parts and accessories - Guaranteed
  • VinceDC

Posted July 09, 2012 - 11:34 AM

#4

I have ridden a 400 and 426 back to back and the power difference is minimal if any.The 400 has stainless valve which are more durable.The 426 has a different clutch and crank(as mentioned)that is stronger.

  • Pooley

Posted July 09, 2012 - 05:43 PM

#5

The only thing I can think of as a difference is in power delivery. I have a friend who used to ride a WR400 and now rides a 2003 WR450. If I remember correctly he said that the 426 has more of an aggressive "hit" over both the 400 and 450. Against the 400 it was mostly due to a bit more power, lighter valves, faster reving etc, but against the 450 was likely due to the computer mapping making the power delivery a bit softer in the 450.

Edited by Pooley, July 09, 2012 - 05:43 PM.


  • vfr661

Posted July 11, 2012 - 11:05 AM

#6

I own both a 2000 wr400 and a 2002 wr426 and I am not able to tell the power difference. The 426 has larger front disk brake and better radiator. I wouldn't let the differences in the 400 and 426 be a deciding factor in your purchase of a wr. It's best to find the best operating shape wr and get it when buying used.




 
x

Join Our Community!

Even if you don't want to post, registered members get access to tools that make finding & following the good stuff easier.

If you enjoyed reading about "" here in the ThumperTalk archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join ThumperTalk today!

The views and opinions expressed on this page are strictly those of the author, and have not been reviewed or approved by ThumperTalk.