Stupid Sprocket Question?
Posted 08 May 2012 - 08:00 AM
Is there a difference in a 12/48 front/rear sprocket combination versus 13/52? Mathematically, the ratio of both is the same, 4.00. Does one or the other have any advantages, or since they are the same overall ratio, do they have exactly the same characteristics?
I have a 2-Stroke 2003 CR250R with the 13/48 stock sprockets. I live in Colorado and do mostly woods/technical riding. Lots of tight turns, then oh crap, up some very steep rock sections. I find myself feathering the clutch while trying to keep the front wheel down.
Yes, I know, 4-stokes are great for trail riding. Most of my friends have 4-strokes and I'm sure I'll have one some day, but for now, I still like my squirlly 2 stroke. I just need more low end. Everything on the bike is stock. I'll look at a FFW and pipe, etc at some point, but want to start with gearing.
Does anyone know if there are any differences in 12/48 vs. 13/52?
Thanks!
Jeff
Posted 08 May 2012 - 03:28 PM
A larger front sprocket is advantagious, but so is a smaller rear.
Edited by moto vita, 08 May 2012 - 03:29 PM.
Posted 08 May 2012 - 06:32 PM
Posted 09 May 2012 - 06:20 AM
LukeYZ426F, on 08 May 2012 - 06:32 PM, said:
Mathmatically, they are the same, but as moto vita stated, the larger diameter of both front and rear sprockets affects chain length and rear wheel locattion depending on how it all works out. Personally, I prefer to run as large a front sprocket as I can. The larger the sprocket, the less friction. Now, is the difference between a 12 and a 13 big enough to notice? I do not know, but why take the chance?
Posted 09 May 2012 - 06:42 AM
As you guys have pointed out, I think it makes a lot more sense to go for the 13/52 over the 12/48. Someone else told me about a situation where they were running too small of a front sprocket and it wore through the chain guide quickly, and started to cut into the swing arm.
Posted 09 May 2012 - 07:23 AM
Also the bigger sprocket will be more likely to contact rocks etc,. thats why trials bikes use sprockets of 40-42 teeth.
There's no easy answer, but your doing the right thing by considering your options.
Posted 09 May 2012 - 02:25 PM
Posted 09 May 2012 - 03:49 PM
Posted 09 May 2012 - 04:05 PM
LukeYZ426F, on 09 May 2012 - 03:49 PM, said:
it is exactly the same final drive ratio as you originally stated.. maybe the TOP 5% of riders in the WORLD would feel the difference of the 13/52 vs. the 12/48 if you could get the axle position exactly the same. According to SOME there is a change in the way anti-squat works when you get on the gas and roll off the gas with the 2 different combos.. I usually say "yea-right" and roll my eyes to that. I highly doubt anyone reading this, me included, could ever tell. 13/52 and 12/48 are the same final drive ratio, you would need 116 links for the 13/52 where you could still use the stock 114 link chain with the 12/48 ..
axle position on the other hand IS something many better riders will feel. It changes a fair amount of things moving the axle significantly forward or back. But again, for 99% of us, don't worry too much about that. you will be pretty safe all teh way forward, or back.
Edited by MELK-MAN, 09 May 2012 - 04:08 PM.
Posted 09 May 2012 - 05:15 PM
Posted 09 May 2012 - 05:28 PM
Posted 09 May 2012 - 05:34 PM
LukeYZ426F, on 09 May 2012 - 05:28 PM, said:
but going to a 12 from a 13 in the front will wear the swingarm guide faster (the front sprocket is now smaller).. if your axle is way forward right now and your at 114 links.. go with 116 links. Moving the axle back will give you some additional clearance on the lower chain guide, and it won't get worn as fast.
Do sprocket combos that equate to the same drive ratio perform the same ? for the most part yes. that is a pretty big change (going up 3 at the rear, or down 1 in front). Why not go with say a 50 rear and stock 13 front.
Edited by MELK-MAN, 09 May 2012 - 05:36 PM.
Posted 09 May 2012 - 06:20 PM
MELK-MAN, on 09 May 2012 - 05:34 PM, said:
Do sprocket combos that equate to the same drive ratio perform the same ? for the most part yes. that is a pretty big change (going up 3 at the rear, or down 1 in front). Why not go with say a 50 rear and stock 13 front.
Posted 22 May 2012 - 06:28 AM
Posted 22 May 2012 - 01:10 PM
I bought a 13/52 kit, but haven't had a chance to try it out yet. Going to Moab this weekend.
The gearing should make a big difference. Did the 11oz FWW make a noticeable difference?
Posted 22 May 2012 - 05:53 PM








