this bike is sick!
Posted 08 February 2012 - 06:31 AM
Posted 08 February 2012 - 06:47 AM
ckny, on 08 February 2012 - 06:08 AM, said:
Dental and eyes are not covered. We pay for drugs as well. Our issue is doctors. We dont have enough, they all go to the US ha ha.
My Dr. is from Canada. She told me when she had her practice up there that her take home pay was around $10 an hour. Thats why she came to the states.
Posted 08 February 2012 - 07:32 PM
ASternad, on 08 February 2012 - 06:31 AM, said:
I think I am the only one in the thread that owns one of the 360s.
I am a 2-stroke guy. I love them and have no interest in owning a 4-stroke so this bike is exactly what I want. The bark, the smell, the power - it is motocross.
Tons of torque. Power comes on nice and smooth but definitely hard enough to let you know it's not a 250. I had taken some time off from riding so the jump from a YZ250 to the YZ360 was definitely noticeable. If you roll on the throttle you will end up on your ass. I spent a fair amount of time learning the throttle/clutch to get good starts and once you get rolling you can just hold it open and it runs away. I have some land and going to build a track on it this spring so I took the bike out there over the weekend and it left trenches when I was practicing starts. I love the power of a good 250 2-stroke so imagine that and add 40% more power...
The suspension is very good. It absorbs the bumps well and it is has felt pretty solid when I have had it in the air. Corners great. I was able to turn on a dime and it is fun doing brake slides. Braking is decent. I sometimes wonder if having all that extra power/mass causes a problem with brakes. So far it seems solid.
The only thing I would change is normal stuff like jetting and clickers.
My verdict is I would do it again. Awesome bike. George @ MPS is a great guy and he knows how to make these things run. No, I am not paid to say that lol
Posted 08 February 2012 - 07:36 PM
highflyernick, on 07 February 2012 - 03:39 PM, said:
Yup
Posted 09 February 2012 - 04:14 AM
Posted 14 February 2012 - 08:14 AM
Posted 16 February 2012 - 05:46 AM
I too am curious to hear more about how it performs compared to the stock 250, especially with regard to the handling.
One concern I've always had about any conversion is I perhaps naively assume the very smart Japanese engineers who design these things design them to handle the specifics and intricacies of the four-stroke engines with regard to everything from weight, weight distribution, rotating mass, power delivery, etc. Indeed, when some riders have been known to "tune" their handling by, say, adjusting the torque or removing cylinder head stays, for example, I guess I don't understand how dropping in an entirely different engine doesn't jack the handling all up.
Also, regarding the engine and power delivery, do you know much about the 360 kit? Maybe I'm showing my age, but I thought the Ohlin's 360 thing was a product of the late 1980s/early 1990s. Is this an old cylinder modified to fit the newer engine or is Ohlin's still building these for the modern bikes?
Thanks for any further info you can provide!
Posted 16 February 2012 - 06:05 AM
Posted 16 February 2012 - 06:36 AM
ah665, on 16 February 2012 - 06:05 AM, said:
The important question is weather or not a chasis and suspension designed for a 250 four stroke is better than a chassis and suspension purpose built for a two stroke engine.
My gut feeling tells me that the four stroke suspension would be a HUGE step backward while the chassis change may improve things (or at the very least break even) due to the learning curve with aluminum frames over the past decade.
Either way, that 360cc engine has got to be pumping out some awesome power. Maybe even enough to run with a 450F?
Posted 16 February 2012 - 06:58 AM
cwtoyota, on 16 February 2012 - 06:36 AM, said:
My gut feeling tells me that the four stroke suspension would be a HUGE step backward while the chassis change may improve things (or at the very least break even) due to the learning curve with aluminum frames over the past decade.
Either way, that 360cc engine has got to be pumping out some awesome power. Maybe even enough to run with a 450F?
I have no doubt my bike would hang with a 450F. I can't say the same about myself right now but once I get more time in on it this year I should be able to show some F's what a 2-stroke can do. I haven't put enough time on it to have a complete opinion but I am very happy with it so far.
Posted 16 February 2012 - 07:07 AM
cwtoyota, on 16 February 2012 - 06:36 AM, said:
My gut feeling tells me that the four stroke suspension would be a HUGE step backward while the chassis change may improve things (or at the very least break even) due to the learning curve with aluminum frames over the past decade.
Either way, that 360cc engine has got to be pumping out some awesome power. Maybe even enough to run with a 450F?
Posted 16 February 2012 - 10:29 AM
Posted 21 February 2012 - 02:43 PM
SMPDaddy, on 05 February 2012 - 09:01 PM, said:

Posted 21 February 2012 - 06:03 PM
ah665, on 16 February 2012 - 06:05 AM, said:
I dont think you looked at the kit hard enough. Its more then a "plastic kit". Its the whole rear end of a 250f (subframe, airbox, fender, side panels), combined with completely new tank and all the brackets for fitting new shrouds on properly, not just some jimmy rig system. Though I imagine the characteristics remain the same as a orginal YZ, the feeling of the body would be different as well as the look. The YZ 250s are one of the best handling bikes around so thats not a bad thing. The motors between the 2 bikes will be the same. The work into either bike is going to be simular also as its not like building a one-off tank is easy. Or buliding a subframe. The fact is, to say its "just a plastic kit: is a understatment.
Posted 22 February 2012 - 07:12 AM
Posted 22 February 2012 - 07:27 AM
Just a thought, no pun intended here....
Posted 10 May 2012 - 03:21 PM
Stay Healthy!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

















Follow us: