I understand that a lot of people think the KX is old and cumbersome. It's wider at the knees, yes. And, it is cumbersome with the Mushy stock suspension set-up.
However, It's still avail. for $4999...thank you Kawasaki! and!!!! With the suspension and "Dog-Bones" from Pro-Circuit, Thanks Bones!, I'll put the whole handling argument on it's ear.
Yes, the Honda's nice; however, I disagree on the accessory statement. Maybe it's because I'm too familiar with the KX...but, I've never seen it(the CR) win many off-road events of any kind. I know of a guy who's had great success in the Iron-man class at the BITDs, though, to be fair.
Steering dampers, as used by both woods and desert folk, are readily avail. and on the shelf for the KX. Same with gas-tanks.
I've always been amazed at the power claims of the Hondas. Kawi has always won the power argument on all grounds. MX holeshots, Desert drags and Dune races.
Torque, too, for that matter (Kinda nice on the trails...). In the 80s it was Honda's game to loose. And they did, in my book. Up until '87...it was all Honda. And, for MX, they built a hellova bike in the early '90s that was pretty much unchanged until '01.
When the MX Nat's became production based, what happened to Honda?
Now, for a real brain-teaser for you Honda guys:
www.honda.com.au Now, find the CR500E...Go figure!!!!Street legal, too!
Manny
