Xr218r
Posted 27 April 2011 - 01:27 AM
Posted 27 April 2011 - 01:44 AM
Dwight_Rudder said:
Sounds like a great build! Where's the pics?
Posted 27 April 2011 - 05:32 AM
KDXIdaho
Posted 27 April 2011 - 05:48 AM
KDXIdaho said:
KDXIdaho
I wanted to keep the stock front end with the 1986-90 suspension so I can keep the drum brake to be able to use the bike in Post Vintage AHRMA Competition.
The stock drum works pretty damn good. I have the stock front end working as well as my 1997 XR250R forks I used on my CRF250F (formerly 230) project.
The bike actually looks stock. Same bike as in my Avatar.
Dwight
Posted 27 April 2011 - 07:58 AM
As a side note the 84-85 XR250R mufflers fit the 86-02 XR200 frame, have less back pressure than the 200 muffler, a 1 1/2" inlet and mid pipe, and the XR200R diffusers fit.
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:37 PM
chuck4788 said:
As a side note the 84-85 XR250R mufflers fit the 86-02 XR200 frame, have less back pressure than the 200 muffler, a 1 1/2" inlet and mid pipe, and the XR200R diffusers fit.
Don't know if it will fit my 1.25" header.
Posted 29 April 2011 - 10:17 PM
Posted 01 May 2011 - 11:54 PM
Dwight_Rudder said:
Pulled the 14T fine in the lower gears but spaced to wide in the upper gears.
Going back to the 13T and maybe a 46T rear instead of the 47T.
Disappointed in jetting. Still blubbers badly at 1/4 throttle. Pilot is as small as it can go with the 35Pilot . A/S set at 1/2 turn out. Needle in the # 3 position. Tried #2 but it started overheating. Main is now a 118 and I think I will drop it to a 112 or a 115 and see how it runs. Now it runs good when cool but quickly starts blubbering when it heats up.
Posted 02 May 2011 - 06:29 AM
Sounds like it's rich at 1/4 since it's a hot misfire. If it were me, I'd leave the main at 118 or 120 (or richer) and drop the needle. IMO, I'd be careful on running the main lean since it can make you think you fixed a part throttle issue but end up making it run hot and detonate at WOT. That race cam with all that overlap and duration is gonna make it a bear to get that thing jetted right at partial throttle. Depending on how duration/overlap the cam has, part throttle jetting is gonna be a compromise anyway. Have you talked with Powroll on jetting that cam?
Another thought... If you think the cam is a little too hot and messing with your carburetion too much, try adding a two or three thousands clearance to the intake and see if it goes away. It's an easy way of reducing duration/overlap to increasing vacuum signal to the carb. That would be my last option if you can't get the jetting cleaned up. Good luck and keep us up to date.
KDXIdaho
Posted 02 May 2011 - 07:44 AM
I'm thinking along the very same line as KDXIdaho.
Old School Al
Posted 02 May 2011 - 10:23 AM
Posted 03 May 2011 - 12:19 AM
Posted 03 May 2011 - 08:46 AM
I would think your smaller header would only hurt top end with the full race cam. Usually a smaller header is used to improve low to mid ............. where you're having trouble. Although here I bet all duration and overlap of the full race cam is overiding the effect of the small header.
With a torque cam you're going to the other extreme. One thing to keep in mind is that stroker motors don't like to be reved. The torque cam brings the power in at a lower rpm to stay out of the danger rpm area of the stroker. I don't know how much mid to top you can tweak out of a torque cam. I wonder if you're going to like the torque cam ....... even though the stroker will.
Old School Al
Posted 03 May 2011 - 09:47 AM
Posted 03 May 2011 - 09:49 AM
Swiss
Posted 03 May 2011 - 09:52 AM
I will let you know when I get the cam in.
Posted 03 May 2011 - 11:26 AM
If you can live with short shifting and not reving you may be able to live with the torque cam. A little past mid it starts to flatten out and dosen't get much done ....... ready for the next gear. Right off the bottom to mid is where it makes it happen. The real plus side of this cam is the engine will stay together. Interesting to see what it does tweaked. I'd try the pipe you have. We run the larger 1.5" ...... but with a insert.
Al
Posted 03 May 2011 - 01:43 PM
A while back I did some comparison tests on 200 exhaust systems and demonstrated that larger head pipes help bottom end throttle response, so do larger mid pipes but with more noise. So I think you are on the right track. The best bottom end power, and the noisiest, was the XRsOnly header and a 84 XR250 muffler wo insert (1 1/2" midpipe). This combo was impressive and pulled the baseline bike 1 1/2 lengths in the bottom of second gear.
I'm currently running a XRsOnly header on my stroker with an IDS2 muffler (1 3/4" core) with a 1 3/4" mid pipe. Changing discs helps with tuning and reducing noise is still a work in progress, currently I'm trying a 1 1/4" stinger to reduce noise.
I feel your pain on jetting; when its wrong it is frustrating. I also started out rich and worked leaner, it is now stock except the needle is one grove rich and the main is a 112. Yogi also had a stroker motor but with a Big Gun exhaust, you might check with him on jetting.
If you are a short shift rider you will like the Torque cam, always puts a grin on my face.
Looking forward to your comparison of the torque and race cams.:thumbsup:
Posted 30 May 2011 - 08:43 AM
chuck4788 said:
Dwight; Any news on the new cam?
http://www.thumperta...ad.php?t=932842
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
















Follow us: