WR450 Vs. YZ450F?
Posted October 26, 2010 - 03:16 PM
I won't be doing much MX, but want to hit technical single track, hill climbs, and also looking to get into doing some enduros and desert racing with a buddy of mine who keeps bugging me.
Which bike would most ppl recommend: the WR450 or the YZ450?
The obvious advantages of the YZ to me is lighter weight.
The obvious advantages of the WR seeme to be a light, and possibly better mpg.
But, I know there is more to it than that, so any feedback would be appreciated!!
I'm also considering a KTM, so if you think that is better than either Yamaha option, let me know.
Thanks a bunch!
Posted October 26, 2010 - 06:51 PM
I'm not finding one that includes the YZ
Posted October 26, 2010 - 07:13 PM
Posted October 26, 2010 - 07:16 PM
Posted October 27, 2010 - 08:09 AM
But, my favorite so far, is the Yamaha WR450! That's more than likely what I will go with in the end.
But, since I have to fork out a couple 1000 on household repairs now, I will have some more time to think about it
Posted October 27, 2010 - 11:32 AM
Posted October 27, 2010 - 02:18 PM
- Oil change every 1000km - YZ would be every ride, not sure about the KTM
- rebuild approx every 12000km - the new KTM are every 2000 and a YZ wouldnt be far behind.
I would be caucious of the KTM 530. they are a massive bike for just trail riding. the 450 will be plenty. remember KTM now make a 400 because 90% of riders couldnt handle the 450!
- the WR is the most reliable enduro on the market by far!
Posted October 27, 2010 - 02:49 PM
He doesn't need a Dual Sport. He has one. A new leftover 2 stroke will be half the cost of a 450, doesn't need oil changes, it's way lighter, it's more reliable, cheaper to maintain, and it's way better on technical single track and perfect for racing enduros or desert. He is only going to shave 30lbs from his DS bike with a woods 450.
I don't see how you can't see that. I also don't see how you say that with such a condescending tone. I have a WR450 and it's a great bike for what I do with it. However, I have it just for the ability to ride some fire roads if I need to on our rides, plus it makes a better exploring bike. If I didn't need the plate or I started racing again, and I bought a second bike, I would have a 2 stroke. It's not even something I would have to contemplate.
Out of the two choices he thinks he wants, the WR hands down. The YZF he would end up selling in 6 months after he loses a few grand in the process.
Posted October 27, 2010 - 02:59 PM
Posted October 27, 2010 - 06:40 PM
I actually thought about a 2 stroke, but shot it down for a totally unrelated reason. where I live there is tons of open desert and its easy to put together loops hundreds of miles long right out of your garage, but you need to be able to stop at a gas station and just fill up ;-)
I am still a bit bummed about it being only 30 lbs less, one reason the YZ450F sounded appealing .. 55 lbs less.
But, also wanted to ask ... what's a rebuild entail?
Posted October 27, 2010 - 07:07 PM
YZ lighter = PRO
YZ better on the track = PRO
YZ Lighter flywheel = CON on the trails and tight stuff PRO on the track
WR has lights = PRO
WR can make street legal = PRO
WR 5th gear = PRO
WR quieter = PRO
WR Electric Start = PRO
WR heavier = CON
WR heavier flywheel = PRO in the trails CON on the track
Essentially, this is what I came up with. I am too old and heavy to ride the tracks now but I can still rip on the trails. What I decided to get was the WR. I then did all the usual mods like the throttle stop, airbox, gray wire, etc. I also bought a larger pipe insert, RevLock Clutch and then the YZ Exhaust Cam. WOW, I love this bike. It flat rips, is it as quick as a YZ? No, but it is much quicker than a stock WR with all the simple mods. It is a great trail bike with the RevLok. If I had to do it all over again, I would make the same choice.
If you want to be 55 lbs lighter, lose weight, thats what my wife tells me. I tell her I need something because its lighter, she tells me to lose the weight off of myself first. I don't want to sound rude or insensitive because I am in the same boat as you. I could stand to lose some weight.
Posted October 27, 2010 - 07:32 PM
If you bought a WR450, I think you would be happy. If you bought a 2 stroke for your "serious" rides, I think you would be happier with the performance. However you mentioned doing "long" rides, and that is why I'm on the WR. More comfy over a long period, but at a sacrifice in performance on the technical singletrack. There is no perfect bike. You will always be giving up something to gain something. That is why I advocate having two bikes. A WR450 type with a plate for adventure exploring type fun rides with your buddies, and a 2 stroke for serious stuff like racing or tackling real technical trail.
As you can tell, the YZF and other MX450's are completey out of the question for me, and the majority of amateurs. Top level guys can make it work racing offroad, Mullins just won the National Enduro on a YZF, Whibs win's GNCC/OMA races on it, but they are not us. Doing 100-150 mile rides for fun on it, will not be fun. It's made for one thing only. Racing on an MX track. It wants to go fast all the time, cruising trails is not what it does.
Posted October 27, 2010 - 09:29 PM
The YZ 250 is super light and a good all around bike. It has the same HP as the 08 WR450. Both are around 46.
The WR and KTM are heavy. But, the e start is fun. The WR suprisingly turns better than the YZ250 2t.
Anyways, it's a tough decision. They are all good bikes. Determine what your primary purpose is and choose based on that. If all I was doing was riding woods I would have a KTM 300 or YZ 250. But...the thumper is fun in the wide open and for nastly long hill climbs.
Posted October 27, 2010 - 11:02 PM
- doesnt need oil changes - still needs gear oil and premix
- way lighter - yeah, but the rider is 300lbs
- more reliable - doubt it, what goes wrong with a WR?
- cheaper to maintain - not really, 2t- rings, oil, spark plugs, oiled up exhaust etc etc. what do you have to do to a wr, check the valves every 5000km, they havnt moved so ride on.
- sure the 2t might be better in the tighter stuff but i just feel the WR will not wear you out so much. its just an easier bike to ride fast. i undertand the weight factor wearing you out, but what about the engine, the WR is so user friendly compared to a YZ. the YZ is like a crazy mountain bike and the WR like riding a slightly bigger mountain bike but feels like your in a limo
- the majority of enduro riders are on 4t and so are motocross - Honda doesnt even make 2t anymore.
it is a preference thing and I rode 2t for years, but i wont be going back.
Posted October 27, 2010 - 11:20 PM
Posted October 28, 2010 - 04:18 AM
- way lighter - yeah, but the rider is 300lbs
I think my OP might have been misleading
I'm not 300 lbs ... the WR250R is. I'm about 170
Posted October 28, 2010 - 04:22 AM
Rebuild on a 2 stroke is nothing. Cost maybe $150 and anyone who can read and can loosen and tighten bolts can do it in less than 2 hrs. I'm experienced and I won't even attempt to rebuild a modern 4 stroke motor. I think just the parts cost me close to $600. I got a few estimates and it would been quite a bit just for a top end. I've had heard of several $2k and above rebuilds. However, that seems to be very rare on a WR.
I just recently got into riding again after maybe about 10 years or more, so I may have forgotten, but I don't remember ever doing a rebuild when I used to be into MX - had a YZ125 and a YZ250.
What exactly is a rebuild? Maybe I called it something else?
How often would a WR need one as well? Sounds pricey?