First anti-ORV legislation of the year
Posted 14 January 2009 - 02:26 PM
Posted 14 January 2009 - 02:36 PM
chuck4788 said:
One problem is that NMA, WOHVA, and BRC membership is less than the Sierra Club. For whatever reason, the SC is more effective in gaining general membership that may not ever venture onto public lands .
Posted 14 January 2009 - 07:18 PM
tod701 said:

On the capitol steps
Will WOHVA have a flier out soon? I'd love to see this thing grow to huge proportions:thumbsup:
Posted 15 January 2009 - 07:44 AM
chuck4788 said:
Because I am too lazy and nobody has done it for me
I can do about 25 percent off the top of my head, but the rest take a little thinkin'
SJMC_DON said:
I haven't seen it yet, but will try to find out today.
Posted 15 January 2009 - 07:55 AM

And the prime sponsor Senator Ken Jacobsen
Posted 15 January 2009 - 09:05 AM
tod701 said:

And the prime sponsor Senator Ken Jacobsen

GEE! What a shocking surprise! Freaking arrogant morons.
Posted 15 January 2009 - 10:42 AM
If someone is actually damaging private or public property with an offroad vehicle, that is already illegal and should be punished using existing laws.
If it is appropriate to send someone to jail for damaging a vegetable with an offroad vehicle, why wouldn’t doing the same harm with an automobile, horse hoof or shoe be just as heinous a crime and be punished equally severely?
Sending someone to jail for merely damaging any vegetation while otherwise legally operating an offroad vehicle is more than a bit disproportional in a state where the Court Rules list the maximum penalty for something as serious as driving the wrong way on the freeway as $182.
Taking funds from the Non-highway and Offroad Vehicle Activities account to pay for damage done by offroad vehicles at place where offroad vehicles are not allowed is like taxing sober drivers to pay restitution to the victims of drunken drivers.
Posted 16 January 2009 - 08:52 AM
Jason
Posted 17 January 2009 - 08:49 PM
We always play defense. If you only defend your loss is inevitable.
The older I get, the more Hiatt I get.
ETA: The word filtered above rhymes with bass poles. Since we have a nanny filter at TT now, I think these people are a bunch of **** ******s too. Adam Kline would probably take that as a compliment. Well Adam, you are a **** ****** but you are not very good at it. How's THAT?
Posted 19 January 2009 - 07:47 AM
-It is unbelievable that in these tough economic times (with huge local budget shortfalls, police agencies losing positions, schools closing, and a 6 billion dollar budget shortfall) an elected official believes that the biggest priority should be banning orv use on public land. Even if I was against orv's, I would think that this is a totally screwed up set of priorities.
-An anti-obesity measure? Noticed a pretty good double-chin there-have you looked in the mirror you fat piece of ^$^%$???
-I am a law enforcement officer. I do not need the state telling me that my time should be spent arresting law-abiding good citizens and seizing their property when I have meth labs/users, car thefts, robberis, burglaries, and other real crime to deal with. Nor would I consider any arrest in good faith.
-I dont get to seize a person's car for driving drunk and endagering countless lives-why should I have the authority to seize an ORV for just riding on a piece of land?
-It never ceases to amaze me at the lack of education that these individuals have on ORV use before making a lifetime long judgement against it. They have no idea of the healthy lifestyle and family atmosphere that ORV use is for most people. They see one 'tard on a bike or quad with flip-flops and a baseball cap and assume that we are all like that-worse yet, no amount of evidence will sway that.
-Finally, to any MX-only riders (such as myself) reading this thread. You may think that this only affects trails-don't be this short-sided. If measures like this pass, it will be a springboard for other bills. Please join in the fight to save ANY legal riding area, whether you use it or not. I can't emphasize this enough.
Posted 20 January 2009 - 07:19 AM
omalley1537 said:
Got that right....if they get an inch they'll eventually take a mile.
Posted 20 January 2009 - 11:11 AM
superfsh said:
To make sure that EVERY single once legal mile now becomes illegal.
Posted 20 January 2009 - 01:11 PM
shrubitup said:
And the crime rate goes up
Posted 20 January 2009 - 05:12 PM
omalley1537 said:
-I dont get to seize a person's car for driving drunk and endagering countless lives-why should I have the authority to seize an ORV for just riding on a piece of land?
That's because the legislature reps. don't want their cars impounded while heading home after a long day of spending your tax dollars.
Posted 21 January 2009 - 11:17 AM
Karen Fraser: fraser_ka@leg.wa.gov
James (Jim) Hargrove: hargrove_ji@leg.wa.gov
Brian Hatfield: hatfield.brian@leg.wa.gov
Ken Jacobsen: Jacobsen_Ke@leg.wa.gov
Bob Morton: Morton_Bo@leg.wa.gov
Kevin Ranker: ranker.kevin@leg.wa.gov
Val Stevens: stevens_va@leg.wa.gov
Dan Swecker: swecker_da@leg.wa.gov
These people need to know that ORV's are a source of tax revenue to their Comittee. ORV's pay an $18 fee per year, plus sales tax on new bikes and parts, along with gas taxes. A decline in available ORV land use is a decline in their tax revenue streams. With a $5+ Billion dollar shortfall in tax revenue, I would hope they will want to perserve every dollar. SB5128 directly impacts their revenue stream... As for SB5129: If the size of the decal is changed, there will also be a cost. They will loose the money (already) spent on the current supply of decals, and a direct cost to produce the new form factor decal. Once again, this is money they won't be able to direct to the funds collected for Natural Resource. The change in the decal does nothing to help Natural Resources nor law enforcement for that matter. It is purely an expenditure with no return on the investment.
Let's try to get these (2) bills killed before they make it to committe...
Good Hunting!
andy t.
Posted 21 January 2009 - 11:49 AM
Mr. Nordwall---
Here is a link to track the bill. http://apps.leg.wa.g...=5128&year=2009
It doesn’t have many sponsors, so we'll hope it dies in (Senate) committee and leave it at that.
Thanks again for contacting our office.
Sincerely,
Blair Anderson
Legislative Asst. to Rep. Mike Hope
360-786-7892
Posted 21 January 2009 - 12:06 PM
jason_n said:
Mr. Nordwall---
Here is a link to track the bill. http://apps.leg.wa.g...=5128&year=2009
It doesn’t have many sponsors, so we'll hope it dies in (Senate) committee and leave it at that.
Thanks again for contacting our office.
Sincerely,
Blair Anderson
Legislative Asst. to Rep. Mike Hope
360-786-7892
It's good to hear that some of our legislators are against these bills. But don't think we have it made just yet. Karen Fraser is also on that committee and she carries a big stick. If I'm not mistaken she is still the chair of the budget committee.
Posted 21 January 2009 - 12:12 PM
Subject: Washington State Vehicle License Fee Bill SB6900 Not a Joke
It is for real. You will hear more about it in the media the closer we get to it's February hearing date.
By Senators Tom, Kohl-Welles, Pridemore, Keiser, and Kline
Vehicle License Fee Bill SB6900
There is a bill that the Washington State Legislature is trying to pass
in Olympia that, if successful, will directly add huge costs to our
vehicle license fees. Everyone needs to know about this situation so
that you can contact your representatives and voice your objection.
The bill is SB 6900 and it adds an "engine displacement and CO2 emissions" fee to the
vehicle license tabs upon renewal.
The fee has a varied amount depending on the size of the vehicle's engine:
Engine Size (liters) Rate Schedule
Up to 1.9 $0
2.0 - 2.9 $70
3.0 - 3.9 $225
4.0 - 4.9 $275
5.0 - 5.9 $325
6.0 - 7.9 $400
8.0 or over $600
For each car & truck that you own, calculate the rate by matching the
engine size in liters to the dollar amount. Add the amounts for each
vehicle and you'll see that the average two car family will be paying
$500+ every year in "displacement fees" on top of the normal license
fees. If you have three vehicles, you'll be paying even more.
The average family is already struggling with the high cost of gasoline,
electricity, food and everything else, and our lawmakers want us to pay
more, thinking we have unlimited deep pockets. This will do great damage
to the budgets of retirees on fixed incomes as well.
Now is the time to be very vocal against this bill.
I have contacted all of our representatives, and I would encourage
everyone reading this to do the same.
Here's the web page for the bill where you can read the text:
http://apps.leg.wa.g...=6900&year=2007
Here's the link for contacting your representatives:
http://apps.leg.wa.g...er/Default.aspx
If we don't threaten mass rebellion over this, they'll pass this bill
and we'll be paying huge fees every year on top of their increase in
the gas tax. They have to know that we won't stand for any more taxes or
increase in licensing fees.
I've told my representatives that I will actively work to see that any
lawmaker that supports this bill is replaced at election time.
Please contact your legislators, then copy the text of this email, and
forward it to as many people as possible that you know in Washington
State, and encourage them to contact their representatives and strongly
voice their objection to this bill.








