wr400 or 426.....is the latter that much better?
Posted June 08, 2002 - 12:37 PM
is the 426 that much better?
are there any weaknesses/reliability issues with the 426 that i should be aware of when viewing a
have seen a cleanish 426 today BUT its done in exess of 5000km [been used as a mainly street bike]
Posted June 08, 2002 - 12:44 PM
Posted June 08, 2002 - 01:20 PM
What goes wrong with the 2000 models clutches?
I only have about 1400 kilometres on my 2000 wr400 and havent had any clutch problems yet.
I'm just interested to know so I can look out for any signs or symtoms on my bike.
Posted June 08, 2002 - 02:54 PM
Posted June 09, 2002 - 02:38 AM
it would be in better shape if it was street driven mostly. Just my 2 cents
Posted June 09, 2002 - 03:12 AM
Theory is they dont like WR valve timing - YZ timed ones dont seem to blow up. But this comment is not backed up by any kind of testing!!! Just stories and theories I have heard.
I rev the nuts off my WR, especially in supermoto trim. Always hitting the rev limiter and it never misses a beat.
Wait for the reworked engine in the 450!
Posted June 09, 2002 - 03:46 AM
[ June 09, 2002: Message edited by: Tony Miller ]