Yamaha XT250 or Honda 230L
Posted 09 March 2008 - 08:44 AM
Right now I am leaning toward the Yamaha, but I have read good reviews on both. I had a CRF230F (recent model with newer engine), so I know that it is bulletproof....but it sure isn't any powerhouse (the L has a 6 speed trans however). The XT has the same engine as the new Raptor 250 quad, and everybody raves at how much power they are getting out of this little engine (borrowed out of the Tricker motorcycle).
http://www.topspeed....-xt/ke2739.html
http://www.topspeed....a/index163.html
What about tires???? Are there any DOT approved tires that are more agressive for off-road than what comes on these machine stock????
Posted 10 March 2008 - 06:53 PM
Posted 11 March 2008 - 09:09 AM
Yamaha
XT250 – Looks like the engine is completely new this year. Also new to the bike is the added weight. Either Yamaha is much more honest this year with reported weight or the bike has gained some. What the bike lost was sixth gear and the zerk fittings on the suspension links even though the suspension looks virtually identical to the 225 except for the new rear disk caliper mount. A new rear disk will provide more confidence compared to the drum on the 225 when wet. Valves are still adjustable via tappets and feeler gauge. Other than the added CCs and a rear disk I don’t see much improvement. The loss of 6th gear and the added suspension maintenance is a disappointment. To be fair the others in this class don’t have grease fittings either.

WR250R - Looks like a close copy of the WR250F with one less radiator, a steel downtube, and a bunch of emissions stuff. We didn’t look closely at this one due to the HIGH seat. If you can’t plate a real WR this is worth a look (#1 non-competition enduro like dual-sport).

TW200 – Dad was set on this bike going in. The big tires and crawling ability were attractive. In reality the bike is heavier feeling than the others and the wide seat makes it harder to flat foot. The 200 CC displacement and the lack of 6th gear was also a let down.

Kawasaki
KLX250 – Little more old school that the WR above. Seat is too high for my dad. The KLX is a good old school thumper. The chassis is the second best for serious off-road behind the WR and ahead of the CRF. I like the WR a bit more than this one and the WR has more power stock but the KLX has a big list of potential modifications including a 300 cylinder. This is the most off-road bang for the dollar.

Suzuki
DR200 – Love the tank!! 3.5 gallons is wonderful. Otherwise looses out due to the small displacement and 5 speed tranny.

Honda
CRF230L – Let me preface this by saying that this is the bike of choice for dad. The CRF has up to date looks on a good chassis with a low seat height. The engine is the typical 2 valve easily maintained engine layout. Six speed gearbox and 230ccs are a big plus. Front and rear disk brakes to get the stopping done. The bike also is closely related to the CRF230F so aftermarket options are bound to be larger. To top it all off the bike has a great review at MotorcycleUSA.com. For those who want a small but up to date bike this may be the ticket.

http://www.motorcycl...?ArticleID=5943
Posted 12 March 2008 - 06:01 AM
To me, the XT seems kind of tall in the tank area. It feels heavy (they all do!), but with a full tank of gas up high like that, it is going to be even more top heavy....
I am leaning toward the Honda at this point, but I'm not in any hury....
Posted 12 March 2008 - 07:45 AM
The TW200 is attractive here in the desert because of those huge tires, but I fear it will be very underpowered and it has a very small fuel tank.
Posted 12 March 2008 - 08:22 AM
Posted 12 March 2008 - 01:55 PM
reconranger said:
The TW200 is attractive here in the desert because of those huge tires, but I fear it will be very underpowered and it has a very small fuel tank.
The tires do help it float on the sand, but really, that's all it has going for it... no power to speak of, and I think the "crawling" capabilities are over rated... with stock gearing
80 miles or so before reserve...
Posted 13 March 2008 - 01:39 PM
I can do a 34" seat height if I have to. That's or even higher is ok off-road, but in traffic it makes it weird when you have to stop and can't quite put you feet down! The KLX is ~35" and the WR is 36"+........
Posted 15 March 2008 - 05:08 PM
Posted 16 March 2008 - 05:38 AM
Posted 16 March 2008 - 01:34 PM
Bought it to cruise around and to ride with my little nephew.
If you have a small inseam (30") like me it is the perfect fitting bike, everything else is too big. Had my heart set on the Suzuki DRZ400S but it was way too tall. So was the Kawasaki KTX 250.
If you want a speed demon on the highway the Honda might not be your best bet.
Feels like I'm riding my mountainbike.
Nice bike if your looking for a small dual sport
Also Kawasaki wanted 400.00 for dealer prep(what a joke).Honda was 89.00 and gave me 15% off gear and they we're cheaper or similar to internet prices on gear before the 15%.
Posted 17 March 2008 - 04:30 AM
Posted 17 March 2008 - 05:44 PM
Paul
Posted 01 April 2008 - 10:54 PM
COAL RUN said:
Posted 02 April 2008 - 08:33 AM
Posted 02 April 2008 - 08:59 AM
COAL RUN said:
Plate revocation on non-factory dual sports is an issue in my state.
Longevity should be about the same. The stock silencer on the KDX is said to be quiet. Get the FMF Gnarly woods for trail power and keep the stock silencer.
Anyway, I think all the BBR mods that can be done to the TTR230 also apply to the XT225.
Posted 02 April 2008 - 09:11 AM
reconranger -if you're in LA area you're welcome to stop by and throw a leg over it, jut to make sure.
I've spent alot of time on the off-road honda230. It's a blast, but the stock suspension sucks. I could play on it all day, as long as no desert whoops are involved.
Posted 02 April 2008 - 11:43 AM
I looked long and hard at all the different choices that would fit her, as she is vertically challenged at just 5'4.
I chose the honda 230L after much looking.
It just flet better to ride is all.
The dealer let me take it for a spin, and wow was i ever impressed by the little honda 230L.
My current DS bike is a KLR650, and the only advantge it has over the honda is top speed on the HWY.
But her honda will haul my oversized butt along at 70 MPH, and i was damn impressed to say the least.
I had to beg the yami shop to let me even ride their bike, and i understood why after a short ride, it felt inferior to the honda in every category i can think of.
I wish she was taller, as i would have liked to get her a Kawi KLX250, but unless she wears boots with 6 inch heels, she would never even mount it....lol
Posted 04 April 2008 - 06:47 PM
So far I love the Honda CRF230L. It is a great little run around and is very solid and peppy. I plan on upgrading the tires (although the stock Bridgestone TW's seem to be very nice for a 80% street DS tire. The engine starts easily and has no flat spots.
Good Luck!








