differences between 2001 and 2007 DRZ 400 E


9 replies to this topic
  • giulio

Posted January 05, 2008 - 07:35 AM

#1

I've been told the 2001 and 2007 drz400E only differs in graphics, exhaust pipe, radiators and stator. Can somebody shed more light on these differences and inform whether the 2001 had any problems? I'm dealing to buy a used one. Thanks

  • Rib Eye

Posted January 05, 2008 - 07:51 AM

#2

The 07 e came with the mikuni carburator instead of the much better FCR. 2001 would be a better bike if it's in good shape.
Or if you don't mind investing $500 or so to purchase the FCR, you can have the peace of mind of a new bike.

  • GOF1

Posted January 05, 2008 - 07:53 AM

#3

Already been answered. The carb isn't the only difference.
http://www.thumperta...hlight=DRZ 400E

  • giulio

Posted January 05, 2008 - 08:18 AM

#4

Sorry, I did not mention that in Italy we can still buy the E model with FCR carb that are made street legal by the importer (not Suzuki) with some mods, among which the turn lights.

  • Smias

Posted January 05, 2008 - 09:10 AM

#5

Lucky neighbor ..! We also have the right 'E models but the damn Suzuki dealer didn't made them street legal like the XRs or KLXs .... I think the Euro 'E DRZs are same from the 2000 except colors .

Visit the ThumperTalk Store for the lowest prices on motorcycle / ATV parts and accessories - Guaranteed
  • Big c

Posted February 19, 2008 - 10:02 PM

#6

i just bought a new drz 400e up in canada and it has the fcr carb stock. the 2007 bike you are looking at might be a california bike.

  • uncleroby

Posted February 20, 2008 - 05:31 AM

#7

Hi Giulio,

you may want to check this out: www.drz-italia.com

The differences are in colors, in the front light plastics, no more cam-chain issue.
(colori diversi, diverso portafaro, diverso tensionatore della catena di distribuzione, quello grigio scuro pre-2002 dava problemi, potenza diversa (?))
Motociclismo tested the E in 2000 and 2003: the 2000 model had 37 HP while the 2003 had 40,8 HP.
Maybe this was due to the fact the 2000 bike tested was not new!?

  • obrianmcc

Posted February 20, 2008 - 06:12 AM

#8

What?.......only the US is priveledged enough to get the new dumbed down E....thank you Cali!

  • Eddie Sisneros

Posted February 20, 2008 - 06:15 AM

#9

no more cam-chain issue


now thats funny!

  • kman780

Posted February 20, 2008 - 08:43 AM

#10

Hi Giulio,

no more cam-chain issue.


As Eddie indicted that is really not the case, the 2001 ACCT (Auto Cam Chain Tensioner) had a spring that tended to break and wipe the engine, the 2004+ ACCT has a stronger spring that does not break but it does stretch the chain and cases it to need replacement early.

An ACCT is not hard to install and is really good insurance.





Related Content

Reviews

Suzuki DR-Z400S 2015 by Bryan Bosch


Suzuki DR-Z400S 2015
  • - - - - -
  • 0 reviews
Wiki
Compression & rebound DRZ400 suspension - last post by bmwpowere36m3

Compression & rebound DRZ400 suspension


Wiki Articles
  • 0 replies
Forums
Photo

Wheelie discussion by Chubs604


Dirt Bike   Make / Model Specific   Suzuki   DR-Z 400
  • Hot  136 replies
Forums
Photo

DRZ400SM fork springs? by Ladyeclectic


Dirt Bike   Make / Model Specific   Suzuki   DR-Z 400
  • 22 replies
Forums
Photo

$2000 for a decent DR-Z 400s...need a reality check!? by sbscale0309


Dirt Bike   Make / Model Specific   Suzuki   DR-Z 400
  • Hot  30 replies
 
x

Join Our Community!

Even if you don't want to post, registered members get access to tools that make finding & following the good stuff easier.

If you enjoyed reading about "" here in the ThumperTalk archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join ThumperTalk today!

The views and opinions expressed on this page are strictly those of the author, and have not been reviewed or approved by ThumperTalk.