differences between 2001 and 2007 DRZ 400 E


9 replies to this topic
  • giulio

Posted 05 January 2008 - 07:35 AM

#1

I've been told the 2001 and 2007 drz400E only differs in graphics, exhaust pipe, radiators and stator. Can somebody shed more light on these differences and inform whether the 2001 had any problems? I'm dealing to buy a used one. Thanks

Visit the ThumperTalk Store for the lowest prices on motorcycle / ATV parts and accessories - Guaranteed
  • Rib Eye

Posted 05 January 2008 - 07:51 AM

#2

The 07 e came with the mikuni carburator instead of the much better FCR. 2001 would be a better bike if it's in good shape.
Or if you don't mind investing $500 or so to purchase the FCR, you can have the peace of mind of a new bike.

  • GOF1

Posted 05 January 2008 - 07:53 AM

#3

Already been answered. The carb isn't the only difference.
http://www.thumperta...hlight=DRZ 400E

  • giulio

Posted 05 January 2008 - 08:18 AM

#4

Sorry, I did not mention that in Italy we can still buy the E model with FCR carb that are made street legal by the importer (not Suzuki) with some mods, among which the turn lights.

  • Smias

Posted 05 January 2008 - 09:10 AM

#5

Lucky neighbor ..! We also have the right 'E models but the damn Suzuki dealer didn't made them street legal like the XRs or KLXs .... I think the Euro 'E DRZs are same from the 2000 except colors .

  • Big c

Posted 19 February 2008 - 10:02 PM

#6

i just bought a new drz 400e up in canada and it has the fcr carb stock. the 2007 bike you are looking at might be a california bike.

  • uncleroby

Posted 20 February 2008 - 05:31 AM

#7

Hi Giulio,

you may want to check this out: www.drz-italia.com

The differences are in colors, in the front light plastics, no more cam-chain issue.
(colori diversi, diverso portafaro, diverso tensionatore della catena di distribuzione, quello grigio scuro pre-2002 dava problemi, potenza diversa (?))
Motociclismo tested the E in 2000 and 2003: the 2000 model had 37 HP while the 2003 had 40,8 HP.
Maybe this was due to the fact the 2000 bike tested was not new!?

  • obrianmcc

Posted 20 February 2008 - 06:12 AM

#8

What?.......only the US is priveledged enough to get the new dumbed down E....thank you Cali!

  • Eddie Sisneros

Posted 20 February 2008 - 06:15 AM

#9

no more cam-chain issue


now thats funny!

  • kman780

Posted 20 February 2008 - 08:43 AM

#10

Hi Giulio,

no more cam-chain issue.


As Eddie indicted that is really not the case, the 2001 ACCT (Auto Cam Chain Tensioner) had a spring that tended to break and wipe the engine, the 2004+ ACCT has a stronger spring that does not break but it does stretch the chain and cases it to need replacement early.

An ACCT is not hard to install and is really good insurance.





Related Content

Forums
Photo

Drz 400 SM tires by Danny V.


Dirt Bike   Make / Model Specific   Suzuki   DR-Z 400
  • Hot  53 replies
Forums
Photo

Wisconsinite762 Mod Thread by Wisconsinite762


Dirt Bike   Make / Model Specific   Suzuki   DR-Z 400
  • Hot  39 replies
Forums
Photo

Buying first DR-Z, need your opinion. by adnonymous


Dirt Bike   Make / Model Specific   Suzuki   DR-Z 400
  • Hot  27 replies
Forums
Photo

What did you BUY for your DRZ today by Craigo 485sm


Dirt Bike   Make / Model Specific   Suzuki   DR-Z 400
  • Hot  1,434 replies
Forums
Photo

Buying a new DRZ400S... For suckers? by greg11


Dirt Bike   Make / Model Specific   Suzuki   DR-Z 400
  • Hot  55 replies
 
x

Join Our Community!

Even if you don't want to post, registered members get access to tools that make finding & following the good stuff easier.

Register Close
If you enjoyed reading about "" here in the ThumperTalk archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join ThumperTalk today!

The views and opinions expressed on this page are strictly those of the author, and have not been reviewed or approved by ThumperTalk.