Hey guys have you noticed the new section with the user review write-ups? I was going to offer to write-up a review of the '08 KX450F and even started to but because I'm not strictly an MX rider/racer I thought it would be better off in the hands of someone who was.

So, there are a few guys on here that come to mind that have '08's that have alot of race time on them and have also raced alot of other late-model MX'ers for comparison. We need to hear from you! Let's get a good, honest, knowledgable write-up put in before some bone-head goon steps up and trashes what should be an AAA+ review of a great bike!

2006 and 2007, too for that matter. I think the way the reviews are formatted, the first review seems to be the only ones that really matters; everything else is just a response to it.

Remember the bafoon that came on here seemingly on a mission to trash talk the KX450F's because he had alledgedly "blown-up" his gear box, or something like that? He was the only one anyone had ever heard of this happening to yet he swore all KX450F's were faulty. Imagine if this guy was the first to write a review?

Do want a "modified" bike review or a stock bike review? Does it matter which?

I would like to see some reviews of the 08 as well. Especially from riders who ride/race in the B to Expert classes.

VETMX808 said:

Thanks vet, you were one that came to mind. I think it should be about the bike in general since aftermarket add-ons are generally a foregone conclusion with mx bikes. If in your opinion it has weaknesses that need to modified then by all means say so. In the end it would be your review wrote-up however you choose.

Anyone else, feel free to chime in.