400 vs 426
Posted May 08, 2007 - 08:53 PM
did a search but couldn't see a great deal of stuff to answer my questions, so here goes. Apologies if it's been done to death...
I am after a trail bike to get me back in after a couple of years out, after reading reviews and test riding my uncles WR 426, I have pretty much decided that one would/could be good for me.
My budget seems to stretch over both 400's and 426's, is one better than the other? Obviously theres a bit more power involved in the 426, though from what I understand its lighter (yeah?).
I will be doing mainly trail/enduro riding with the occasional transport here and there.
Any warnings, tips or anything I should know about these bikes?
Posted May 08, 2007 - 09:00 PM
Posted May 08, 2007 - 09:27 PM
Posted May 09, 2007 - 03:40 AM
Posted May 09, 2007 - 01:12 PM
I imagine there's no real difference in overall reliability etc between engines as (from what I understand) they are essentially the same, the 426 just being bigger bore.
Right, I'll keep my eyes out for an 02 if possible, thanks byggd
Posted May 10, 2007 - 08:56 PM