"Vapor" vs. "Endurance"
Posted July 15, 2006 - 08:42 AM
Posted July 15, 2006 - 02:23 PM
Posted July 15, 2006 - 07:06 PM
I'll Prolly go with the Vapor... I just have to be sure it'll work on a bike with no external battery source.
Posted July 16, 2006 - 08:52 AM
Posted July 16, 2006 - 04:59 PM
Posted July 18, 2006 - 03:33 PM
Posted July 19, 2006 - 08:56 PM
Posted July 19, 2006 - 10:17 PM
Posted July 20, 2006 - 07:41 PM
Posted July 30, 2006 - 09:13 PM
Posted July 31, 2006 - 07:38 PM
actually the manual says the tolerence I beleive but im not sure dont hold me to it. As for the front wiring, it seems to have the same exact style to it from the endurance but its a one piece unit so replacing the old with the new is needed however, same mounting drilled hole, same style mounted piece, etc. Because i had the endurance, no new mounting system is required, the new line fits exactly right where the old one went, i did replace the magnetic pick up but didnt have to. Long story short, if you have the endurance, the front wheel part of the vapors installation, along with the entire install will be a complete breeze!!!!!! Nothing tricky about it, I love this thing.
Posted August 01, 2006 - 10:02 AM
also how accurate is the rpm and water temp?
The rpms match well to what I calculated with a gear chart.
The water temp also seems accurate. When my bike was blasting steam, it read 267F. On the highway, it read 140F, which told me I needed to block off part of the radiator for street use. It responds quickly to coolant temp changes. Not suprising since the sensor is immersed in the coolant flow that exits the motor going to the radiator.