Difference in 2000 and 2002 426's


11 replies to this topic
  • Mossman

Posted July 09, 2004 - 04:17 AM

#1

Can you guys shed some light on what the main differences are in the 2000 and 2002 models? I have a 2000 and have the chance to upgrade to a 2002, is it worth it (condition being equal)?

Thanks!
Joe

  • John_Lorenz

Posted July 09, 2004 - 04:19 AM

#2

Can you guys shed some light on what the main differences are in the 2000 and 2002 models? I have a 2000 and have the chance to upgrade to a 2002, is it worth it (condition being equal)?

Thanks!
Joe



Weight the same

Ergos the same

Style the same

Clutch Differant

Front Brake 2001 and above floaters
calipers, master cylander differant

Engine same

Not much is it worth it To me no

  • Mossman

Posted July 09, 2004 - 04:36 AM

#3

Wow, I was expecting more changes. I guess I will wait to see the condition of the bike.
Thanks!
Joe

  • John_Lorenz

Posted July 09, 2004 - 04:41 AM

#4

If it is a great buy go for it. here are changes, but not allot just refinments. Graphics, seat. Engine refinements are subtle but improvements

  • revolucien

Posted July 09, 2004 - 04:44 AM

#5

didn't they go to titanium valves in 01 or 02? and weight savings elsewhere too.

  • John_Lorenz

Posted July 09, 2004 - 04:48 AM

#6

Yes they did, but the weight is pretty much the same within a couple pounds, IMO no big deal.

Engine refinements where fr reliablity like the o1 clutch fix and the Crank (Right ) going from a key to a Splin Gear to correct a key shearing issue on the gear drive.

So yes there are changes and improvements. Sorry should had been a little more specific, I think what Moss was asking is if it is worth a trade up of his time (the Improvements) IMHO I dont think so unless he is getting on heck of a deal. :thumbsup:

Visit the ThumperTalk Store for the lowest prices on motorcycle / ATV parts and accessories - Guaranteed
  • Matt96xr6

Posted July 09, 2004 - 04:50 AM

#7

Nope. There are TONS of differences.

Internally many engine parts are drilled for less weight. The motor takes less oil: 1400cc vs the previous 1700cc for less weight. Internals of the forks are lighter. Swingarm, linkage and shock (shock is 5mm longer in 2002) are all different.

2000 uses the SS valves, 2001+ use Ti. Header pipe stock has a different bend.

Hubs are wider to use lighter spokes that are tapered.

2000 has solid brake and akebono MC. The 2002 uses the floater up front with the Nissin MC. Out back the rear disc on the 2002 is 245mm vs the previous 240mm.

Subframe is painted on the 2000, 2002 is bare. Airbox is redesigned for less weight, better flow.

Carbs are different designs of the FCR unit.

Tripple clamps move the bars forward 10mm for better positioning on the bike. Cables are lighter units, same with the plastic and changing various fastners from steel to aluminum.

Then you have the 2000 key on the crank vs the 2001 splined crank.

Weight is about 3-5 pounds less on the 2002 vs the 2000 according to various tech specs on the Yamaha Dealer website. It varries by dry weight and ready to ride.

If you want to know all the differences by year, go to your Yamaha dealer and get the Dealer Update Seminar book for the 2000, 2001 and 2002 model years. That book illustrates and list all the changes to every model for each year.

  • Satch0922

Posted July 09, 2004 - 04:52 AM

#8

Here is some good reading. Pay close attention to the last two paragraphs.

http://www.motorcycl...am/01yz426.html

  • Mossman

Posted July 09, 2004 - 05:27 AM

#9

Thanks guys, John is right, I am looking to upgrade my current steed. I know my current ride is mechanically sound, so the risk of buying another used bike may not be worth it, even for the 2 model year upgrade. It sounds like I would be better off waiting another year and getting a nice used 450.

Thanks!
Joe

  • rush66

Posted July 09, 2004 - 11:52 AM

#10

does the 01 have the alum subframe ?

  • mnovarossi

Posted July 09, 2004 - 02:28 PM

#11

does the 01 have the alum subframe ?

00 -02 all have aluminum subframes, the 02 subframe is not painted

  • rush66

Posted July 09, 2004 - 07:51 PM

#12

thats what i thought but wasn't sure





Related Content

 
x

Join Our Community!

Even if you don't want to post, registered members get access to tools that make finding & following the good stuff easier.

If you enjoyed reading about "" here in the ThumperTalk archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join ThumperTalk today!

The views and opinions expressed on this page are strictly those of the author, and have not been reviewed or approved by ThumperTalk.