Jump to content

  • Follow us:

  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feed
  • Google+




Related Garage

2_2685f90990b78025353c9f901ee29e95.jpg

Dynojet Research Power Commander III USB


Owner: L28ETS30Z
Added on May 10, 2016



Related Reviews

Dynojet Research Power Commander III USB


Last review by L28ETS30Z
* * * * -

Sisneros Speed Works remap


Last review by mchonda2
* * * * *

Vortex X10 Engine Control Module


Last review by Ctone23
* * * * *

Zip-Ty Racing ECU remap


Last review by Helgar
* * * * *

HMF Engineering Dobeck EFI Tuning Box


Last review by Off-roader123
* * * * *
Photo
* * * - - 2 votes

WR Maps Only

Fuel & Air EFI Programmers

  • Please sign in to reply

136 replies to this topic
  • Ghazzah

    TT Bronze Member

407 posts
Location: New Zealand

Posted March 03, 2016 - 08:34 PM


Yamaha's official maps. ... just wish I had my frickin' scooter to try them on. Grump. Come on Yamaha-NZ. ... R. E. L. E. A. S. E. T. H. E. B. L. O. O. D. Y. B. I. K. E. 

 

8^)-

Attached Thumbnails

  • IMG_2024.jpg


  • willy_fitz

    TT Bronze Member

176 posts
Location: Ontario

Posted May 11, 2016 - 03:00 PM


Did anyone check to see what the baseline map is for the 2016 WR450 Competition Kit ECU?

I got the kit but I won't be able to borrow the programmer for a while and would like to know what to expect with the baseline map.



  • Macsplace

    TT Member

71 posts
Location: Virginia

Posted May 11, 2016 - 04:04 PM


Did anyone check to see what the baseline map is for the 2016 WR450 Competition Kit ECU?

I got the kit but I won't be able to borrow the programmer for a while and would like to know what to expect with the baseline map.

The GYTR Comp ECU kit has the same mapping as the 2016 YZ450FX and runs very. 



  • willy_fitz

    TT Bronze Member

176 posts
Location: Ontario

Posted May 11, 2016 - 05:18 PM


The GYTR Comp ECU kit has the same mapping as the 2016 YZ450FX and runs very. 

 

Very what? Rich? With what mods?



  • Macsplace

    TT Member

71 posts
Location: Virginia

Posted May 11, 2016 - 06:18 PM


Very what? Rich? With what mods?

Lol my bad. The bike runs very well. Mine is de-restricted per the ECU instructions and I have a slip-on FMF Q4. Power is really strong and it starts great. 



  • michale

    TT Bronze Member

213 posts
Location: California

Posted May 13, 2016 - 07:19 AM


My compition ECU came from the factory with all 0s programmed into it. The first time I plugged in the programmer it said it was map 9 and that was all 0s. If that's what you were asking. I stepped of a well tuned 09 wr450 onto the 16 wr450 and I can't believe how much more power it has. The throttle response in increadable. I just installed the Gytr exhaust tip and throttle screw. That's more power than I will ever need. Really it was too much power. I had to use a map that wasn't so aggressive.


Did anyone check to see what the baseline map is for the 2016 WR450 Competition Kit ECU?
I got the kit but I won't be able to borrow the programmer for a while and would like to know what to expect with the baseline map.



  • willy_fitz

    TT Bronze Member

176 posts
Location: Ontario

Posted May 13, 2016 - 07:35 AM


...I had to use a map that wasn't so aggressive.


Which map did you use? I would like to take some of hit out of the bottom and make the bike a little smoother.

  • michale

    TT Bronze Member

213 posts
Location: California

Posted May 13, 2016 - 09:24 AM


I will take a look when I get home. I know it was mostly -1 and -2 on both.

  • michale

    TT Bronze Member

213 posts
Location: California

Posted May 16, 2016 - 01:12 PM


This is the map I am running right now. I like it as its more forgiving.

-1 -2 -0 -2 -2 -2
-2 -2 -1 -2 -1 -2
-2 -1 -1 -2 -1 -2

  • Nathh

    TT Member

53 posts
Location: Australia

Posted May 23, 2016 - 08:33 PM


Hey guys,

 

Anyone know of a good map for a 2012 WR450F with a full akrapovic system (header and muffler) with baffle and spark arrestor removed.

 

The bike runs too lean on stock map with this exhaust so I'm looking for a map which increases fuel while still being pretty smooth power.

 

Don't want a map that's really aggressive or anything, only want to up the fuel so it's not running so lean with this exhaust not because I need more power.

 

Thanks,

Nath.



  • AtomicGeo

    TT Silver Member

960 posts
Location: New Mexico
Garage View Garage

Posted June 03, 2016 - 06:04 AM


Hey guys,

 

Anyone know of a good map for a 2012 WR450F with a full akrapovic system (header and muffler) with baffle and spark arrestor removed.

 

The bike runs too lean on stock map with this exhaust so I'm looking for a map which increases fuel while still being pretty smooth power.

 

Don't want a map that's really aggressive or anything, only want to up the fuel so it's not running so lean with this exhaust not because I need more power.

 

Thanks,

Nath.

 

^^^  Try the Aussie hard pack map. It upp'd my fuel mileage to about 45 mpg and is a mellow trail map.

 

-4 +4 -4        +2 -5 +2

-4 +4 -4        +2 -5 +2

-4 +4 -4        +2 -5 +2



  • brandonschmit

    TT Newbie

8 posts
Location: Colorado

Posted August 13, 2016 - 08:51 AM


Has anyone tried to optimize the map for best fuel mileage on the 2016+ WR450f with aftermarket exhaust?   I'm thinking for a situation where you are riding a dirt road or even pavement and are trying to optimize fuel mileage only (say for a long leg of a trip where you are willing to compromise throttle response and ease of riding) to go the farthest with the least amount of gas used?  I'm assuming 5th gear and holding a constant throttle position?  Would using the least amount of gas and perhaps an advanced timing map give the leanest and most powerful (thus economical) situation?  Is it possible to ruin a bike with a very lean setting or could you literally use the widest setup on the map (most negative gas values with farthest timing advance or at least the timing that gives the most efficient combustion at the RPM that you are riding at (say for example 65mph on highway)?

 

I don't have my bike yet but am starting to contemplate trying to find this particular setting if it exists.

 

Thank you!

 

Brandon



  • Nathh

    TT Member

53 posts
Location: Australia

Posted August 14, 2016 - 01:48 AM


Has anyone tried to optimize the map for best fuel mileage on the 2016+ WR450f with aftermarket exhaust?   I'm thinking for a situation where you are riding a dirt road or even pavement and are trying to optimize fuel mileage only (say for a long leg of a trip where you are willing to compromise throttle response and ease of riding) to go the farthest with the least amount of gas used?  I'm assuming 5th gear and holding a constant throttle position?  Would using the least amount of gas and perhaps an advanced timing map give the leanest and most powerful (thus economical) situation?  Is it possible to ruin a bike with a very lean setting or could you literally use the widest setup on the map (most negative gas values with farthest timing advance or at least the timing that gives the most efficient combustion at the RPM that you are riding at (say for example 65mph on highway)?

 

I don't have my bike yet but am starting to contemplate trying to find this particular setting if it exists.

 

Thank you!

 

Brandon

 

Hey Brandon,

 

I have a 2012 WR450F with an aftermarket exhaust (full akrapovic system) and I find that the bike runs way too lean unless I run a pretty rich map (like the GYTR FMF Map). 

Even with the standard map (all 0's) the bike pops a lot on deceleration like its starved of fuel, I don't even want to imagine what it's like if I went negative with the fuel.

 

There's a reason all the recommended maps for aftermarket exhausts up the fuel by quite a few units. Maybe you should consider a bigger fuel tank rather than a very lean map.

 

Goodluck.



  • brandonschmit

    TT Newbie

8 posts
Location: Colorado

Posted August 14, 2016 - 09:05 PM


Hey Brandon,

 

I have a 2012 WR450F with an aftermarket exhaust (full akrapovic system) and I find that the bike runs way too lean unless I run a pretty rich map (like the GYTR FMF Map). 

Even with the standard map (all 0's) the bike pops a lot on deceleration like its starved of fuel, I don't even want to imagine what it's like if I went negative with the fuel.

 

There's a reason all the recommended maps for aftermarket exhausts up the fuel by quite a few units. Maybe you should consider a bigger fuel tank rather than a very lean map.

 

Goodluck.

That's good advice!  Thank you! 



  • Ghazzah

    TT Bronze Member

407 posts
Location: New Zealand

Posted August 15, 2016 - 11:49 AM


Has anyone tried to optimize the map for best fuel mileage on the 2016+ WR450f with aftermarket exhaust?   I'm thinking for a situation where you are riding a dirt road or even pavement and are trying to optimize fuel mileage only (say for a long leg of a trip where you are willing to compromise throttle response and ease of riding) to go the farthest with the least amount of gas used?  I'm assuming 5th gear and holding a constant throttle position?  Would using the least amount of gas and perhaps an advanced timing map give the leanest and most powerful (thus economical) situation?  Is it possible to ruin a bike with a very lean setting or could you literally use the widest setup on the map (most negative gas values with farthest timing advance or at least the timing that gives the most efficient combustion at the RPM that you are riding at (say for example 65mph on highway)?
 
I don't have my bike yet but am starting to contemplate trying to find this particular setting if it exists.
 
Thank you!
 
Brandon

 

 

Hey. 
 
I'm running the Traction Map (below) and these are my figures from a 160km (100 mile) loop through the local mountains, Grade 3-4 dirt roads and tracks for 100kms (60 miles) and then a 60km (40 mile), 100-120 kmph (60-70mph) run home on sealed public roads. 
 
FMF 4.1 Ti full system. 47 tooth rear, Twin-Air filter and frame with opened up snorkel intake. TKC80s on the bike then. Now running MotoZ Tractionator Desert H/Ts but no figures from these tires yet. BP Ultimate 98RON fuel. 
 
160kms Trip (Garmin)
7.35 litres. 
22km/l. 4.5 litres/100km (62mpg). 165km range. 
 
(Remember that our Gallons are bigger than those in the 'States. Not sure what the conversion is). 
 

edit: Imp Gallon = 4.54 liters. US Gallon = 3.785 liters. So, Imperial 62mpg = US 51mpg, if my maths is not too rusty. 

 

Map 3 ~ ‘Traction’

Fuel/Ign

1   5   3       0   -2   2

2   4   2      -1   -2   1

2   2   2      -1   -2   1

 

~ Richer fuel at lower revs, power comes on less abruptly. 

~ Builds power in a smoother, torquier, more progressive way. 

~ Retarding ignition bottom and mid acts like traction control.

 

 

A more powerful map like the competition map leans out the fuel and would probably return better figures, but I find that it's just too nervous in the throttle response for most adventure riding situations. Most likely this riders lack of raw talent than the map's fault! 8^)-

 

Map 2 ~ ‘Competition Trim’ (YMA Tech Launch)

Fuel/Ign 

0   1   -2       1   2   4

1   2   -2       2   2   2

1   2    0       1   0   1

 

~ ADR restrictors removed, large outlet in endcap. 

~ More fuel at lower revs for added torque. 

~ Less fuel up top to generate more revs. 

~ Ignition advanced across the board to allow engine to rev.

 

8^)-

Gazza. 
 

Attached Thumbnails

  • 6.jpg

Edited by Ghazzah, August 15, 2016 - 12:14 PM.


  • brandonschmit

    TT Newbie

8 posts
Location: Colorado

Posted August 16, 2016 - 10:21 AM


Thank you very much for the figures! I just got my bike and will also post my data once I've done a couple of rides.

  • Spiritwalker2222

    TT Bronze Member

290 posts
Location: Ontario

Posted September 05, 2016 - 03:56 PM


I currently have my map at

 

     FI           IG

 

-1 -1  0      3  4  4

-3 -3 -1      1  2  3

-6 -5 -4     -3 -2 -1

 

My CO is currently at +5.

 

Power delivery feels good. This is with the FMF Q4 Hex S/A muffler, and power bomb header. Snorkel removed, competition ECU and throttle stop.

 

But, I still have an issue with starting. If I press the kill switch for 2 seconds (while moving in gear) before letting the engine die. Or if I crank the motor over for a few seconds with the kill switch pressed. It'll then fire up fine.

 

I need to get an A/F meter and see what's really going on.







Related Content

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

 
x

Join Our Community!

Even if you don't want to post, registered members get access to tools that make finding & following the good stuff easier.

The views and opinions expressed on this page are strictly those of the author, and have not been reviewed or approved by ThumperTalk.